Quantcast

City of Austin Heeds Public Comment on the Budget, Kinda

Needing to slash $11 million dollars in funding, the city of Austin reached out to the public in June, asking for Austinites' input on a variety of public services. In an online survey, Austin city officials asked participants to vote on services in order of importance. Theoretically, those that were deemed less crucial by the public would be cut. About 2,500 people spoke out, requesting a slash in funding for things like the Zilker Park Trail of Lights festival and payment to those who report for jury duty and don’t serve.


It was a brilliant example of the dialogue between government and the people upon which this great country was founded. Then the draft of the budget came out.

Many of the services the public wanted to cut remain intact. In an interview with the Statesman, budget officer Ed Van Eeno said, "Public input is a piece of the puzzle - an important piece, but not the only one." They also ask city workers, volunteer organizations and, of course, the city council.

But it’s not all bad. When it came to adding services, Austin paid attention to the people’s requests, adding more police officers, firefighters and EMTs to the city payroll. They also increased services for the homeless and downtown parks -- all of which was deemed important by the public.

After two meetings (which are open to the public) in September, the final budget will be revised and voted on in time for the beginning of the fiscal year, which starts October 1. Any questions about the budget can be sent here.

So next December when you’re safely ambling along the Trail of Lights, protected by extra police and talking about how much money you made at jury duty, you can thank the City of Austin budget.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@austinist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • tim

    I actually sent an email urging them not to use the data. That was a complete cluster. People voted for things who were for cutting and against cutting. It was completely ridiculous. I saw emails go out urging people to "support" various things proposed for budget cuts, so those people dutifully went and voted to cut the program.

    All they found out were the things people cared the most about.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@austinist.com