Quantcast

I Am So Popular: Of Fuzz Munchers And Tea Baggers


Editor’s note: The views expressed in I Am So Popular are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the outlook or beliefs of anyone else in the IST network.


Last week Warren and I went to West Texas. We didn’t have too many set goals. Mostly we went because it had been nearly a full four weeks since my last vacation and I hate letting a month go by without taking a break from my pressing duties as Austin’s Head Cheerleader— all those free show tickets and gourmet meals can really wear a girl out, you know?

It was my hope that I might actually relax for once, something at which I am admittedly pretty terrible. But I tried, really I did. West Texas lent an assist—phone and internet connectivity are a bitch out there, so for large chunks of time I was disconnected. And yet… somehow, over the course of five days, I managed to get into it with a Tea Bagger. I also was cornered, during a rare moment of wifi, by a woman who demanded proof I am not a big butch dyke. Both events left me contemplating Right Action and asking myself: Should I engage with these fuckers in the name of sticking up for myself and all of humanity? Or should I take a cue from Warren and just laugh it off? You can probably guess which path I took.

Let’s begin with the Are You or Are You Not a Homo? Incident.

Some of you know that I make a good part of my living performing weddings. I advertise at a big commercial wedding website, which brings me leads from people of all walks. Recently, I got a note from the mother of a bride-to-be, asking about my rates and services. I responded with this basic information. She followed up with this query:

To be perfectly blunt, and I sincerely hope you won't be offended, with your name being what it is, it will be asked by some of the family (specifically those who do not live in Austin, if you get my drift) if you are gay. Having read some of your writing, I believe the answer is no, but could you please clarify that issue?

At first, I began to compose a note to her in my head, in which I sympathized. I thought about telling her that I have a lot of homophobes in my family, it happens to the best of us, and…

And then I caught myself. WTF? I asked. WTF WTF WTF? No really, how can it be that in this day and age, some people are still so homophobic? What if she’d asked me if I was black? And how dare I even think about sympathizing? So I wrote back the following:

I must also be perfectly blunt. I do not work with homphobes. I'm sorry my sexuality is important to you. Every year I get more requests than I can handle from people who hire me for my skill and the joyful attitude I bring to ceremonies. Whether or not I choose to munch fuzz in my private time makes no difference to them.

In retrospect, I sort of wish I’d said, You know, I’d love to perform your daughter’s wedding, but I have a contract clause stating I will only do the honors if I’m allowed to stop, mid-ceremony, and hump the bride, a special ritual that sets my services apart.

But I was distracted from composing the perfect riposte by the aforementioned Tea Baggers, who were vying, neck-in-neck, for the role of Who Can Chap Spike’s Ass the Most? To explain this one, a little setup is in order. Maybe it was astrological, or hormonal, or willed by the Gods, but for whatever reason, I was not the most pleasant company last week. As Warren can attest, I was actually in major bitch mode. Sadly, I haven’t the space here to rationalize this behavior and suggest that Warren provoked me—by, say, taking his seatbelt off and rummaging around in the backseat while I was driving 85 mph—and that my sour attitude was ALL HIS FAULT. But it is important to note that, by the time we got to the trailhead for Santa Elena Canyon in Big Bend, I was loaded for bear and, in the moment, ready to file for divorce. So I told Warren, in essence, to take a fucking hike.


Telling one’s equally irritated partner to take a hike in Big Bend nets interesting results. Take a hike? Warren thought, Why not? And so he set off down the trail without me. By the time I cooled off enough to follow suit, my timing was such that I spotted a couple we’d seen the day before while hiking The Window trail. This first encounter was civil bordering on friendly. The menfolk whipped out their big cameras and the womenfolk chatted about vacations, then we parted ways.

But this second encounter—I heard the husband, who’d cornered another hiker, giving her an angry earful about how fucked up the country is, what a dictatorship Obama is running, and how the Democrats are trying to get everyone on welfare, and if you want to know how that’s going to turn out, just look at all the lazy Indians, living on the dole on their reservations. I bristled but hiked on.


Santa Elena Canyon is divided by the Rio Grande. When I reached the massive rock formations where Warren sat, I delivered my laundry list of grievances, and then we both fell silent—it’s hard to stay whipped into a frenzy in one of the most gorgeous places on earth. I sat on one boulder, high above Warren, who sat on another, down by the river.

Along came the Tea Baggers— by now I knew their political views, but the unsuspecting Warren had no idea. I buried myself in a book, vowed not to engage if they started in on another hater diatribe. They began chatting Warren up, and within moments, were going on about how fucked up Mexico is— yes, right there, on the banks of the Rio Grande. Then the husband launched into his anti-Obama shit. This left me feeling like times I’m at the movies and the people next to me won’t shut up. If I ask them to be quiet, I know we’ll all be mad for the rest of the movie. But if I say nothing, I let them ruin the movie for me.


From my perch on high, I spoke. “May I respectfully ask that we don’t discuss politics?” I asked. “Because I didn’t come out here for that. And your politics are different than mine.” And then, to Warren’s delight, I exhibited some on-the-spot hypocrisy, working in a little politics of my own, by explaining to just how much money I make (okay, I exaggerated) and noting that I still can’t get insurance.

Enraged— I guess he thought I wasn’t entitled to my opinion seeing as it differed from his— the husband told his wife that that was that, they were getting out of there. And, as they stormed away, he said— loud enough so that it would echo off the canyon and reach my ears—“There are SO MANY STUPID PEOPLE!!”

Boy, I’ll say.


The next day, in Marfa, we caught a talk at the Marfa Book Company, by some guy who was going on about our need to take action against folks like the Tea Baggers. This time I didn’t mind the political talk, not simply because I agreed with him, but because I willingly and knowingly walked into an event clearly labeled political. (Well that and, they were serving some really awesome free food.) When he was done reading, I raised my hand and asked him to list ways—beyond just sitting around and bellyaching—we might realistically work for change in our day-to-day lives.

He gave a vague answer, nothing concrete. Which left me wondering, what do we do to affect change? Did I actually think my email to the homophobe and my sermon on the mount to the Tea Baggers would suddenly win them over and prompt them to cease their homophobic, racist, classist ways? No, I did not. Really, I just wanted them to shut the fuck up.

Years ago, during the Bush Reign of Terror, I read an article that suggested a lot of liberals were shying away from political talk at parties, fearful of offending others with different views. Even I, with my big mouth, did this a lot. Much as I can’t stand a lot of the bullshit I hear, I try to remind myself that as I am entitled to my beliefs, so the conservatives are entitled to theirs. I might not like what they have to say, but it’s an allegedly free country and all that. I saved my own commentary for my writing and the many protests I attended.

But last week’s adventure changed my mind. I’m not going to go out of my way to provoke unsuspecting strangers in the wilderness. But from now on, when some stranger gets up in my grille, I, too, plan to be perfectly blunt.

Spike Gillespie respects your right to your opinion, even if she doesn’t respect that opinion. She blogs, among other places, at www.spikeg.com.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@austinist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • joiseyboy

    Shackmama, the idea that it was a "lie" was a myth perpetuated by the media, later proved untrue. You're about a decade behind in keeping up with the news. See, for one instance, Casee Closed

    From the November 24, 2003 issue: The U.S. government's secret memo detailing cooperation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.

    BY STEPHEN F. HAYES

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/PUblic/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp



    You probably could have found that with just one or two Google clicks. Vis a vis debt? It's true Bush ran up the debt irresponsibly with his liberal ways (e.g., quadrupling spending on education on a bill he coauthored with Ted Kennedy, introducing a new prescription drug benefit entitlement). But try a few more Google clicks. In eight years, he ran up a deficit of 2.5% of the GDP. In one SINGLE year, Obama has quadrupled that to 10% of the GDP. Obama is the most fiscally irresponsible president in our history. One good starting point to graphically illustrate it can be found here with a single Google click, THe National Debt Road Trip

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5yxFtTwDcc



    Separately, more than a year ago, Obama was exposed by a wave of exposes as quite possibly our most dishonest president, too. Since then? It's only gotten worse. No longer the majority of the nation doesn't trust him or think he's doing even an adequate job.

    JUNE 12, 2009 4:00 A.M.

    Just Make Stuff Up

    President Obama’s war on the truth.

    http://article.nationalreview.com/396847/just-make-stuff-up/victor-davis-hanson

  • joiseyboy

    still it's hard to not feel a lot of empathy for the tea partier's views now that obama's turned out to be such an utter failure, not just 10x worse than bush ever was but quite possibly the worst president in our lifetimes outside of jimmy c. and even jimmy c. didn't fuck up the country by burying it in debt it'll take 60 years to get out of optimistically. bush, at least, was an honest guy and had some intellectual curiosity. obama can't string two sentences together without weaving some new lie and the poor guy is totally provincial having never lived anywhere in his adult life outside of chicago's hyde park and cambridge and never questioned the atavistic theory he was fed in school.

  • shackmama

    joiseyboy - If Bush was so 'intellectually curious' why did he perpetuate the lie that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11 when any common housewife with an internet connection (such as myself) could have learned in 7 mouse clicks that it wasn't true in '02 ?



    'Burying our country in debt' was also the fault of Bush. He came into office with a surplus and squandered it away to avenge the guy who threatened his daddy. The bailout of 08 was Bush's idea, by the way. But I suppose when a china shop has been all smashed up while you weren't paying attention, it's only logical to blame the guy who is now there trying to clean it up when you walk in and finally notice the damage.



    Seeing as the average age of a teabagger is 60, they are a dying breed and will be remembered in the same light as the folks who fought so hard against school integration and civil rights. I empathize with them only because they have stepped over the threshold from ignorance into stupidity.



    Spike - I feel your pain. I have to visit Midland from time to time (as that's where my mama lives) and always come home with a fresh hole in my tongue from biting it so much. But I've learned you just can't argue opinions (even with facts) because some folks have brains that adhere to blind faith and others do not. Thanks for writing for Austinist and please never stop.

  • spikegillespie

    oh, but sometimes they say, "who do I write the check out to?" then i correct them and say it's "whom" not "who."

  • spikegillespie

    Usually what they say is, "to whom do I write out the check?"

  • cprincipe

    So let me get this straight - you make a good portion of your living as a wedding officiant, and yet in a previous post on Austinist you say "On the other hand, given divorce rates, it’s not like monogamy seems to work particularly well either."



    So you feel free to get up on your high horse about others but have no problem taking money from people participating in a ceremony that you don't believe is a successful endeavor? What would your potential clients say about that?

  • Patrick

    What do we do to affect change? Exactly doing what you do best. Writing about your views. Everyone has a different way of expressing themselves. You do it with writing. Thanks Spike.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@austinist.com