Quantcast

Review: Alice! at the Vortex [theater]

Alice_CheshireCat.jpg Mashups are frickin' awesome. Google search "A Stroke of Genie-us" and try not to dance... if you want an exploded head. Mashups take songs that were never meant to be together and blend them into an evocative melange of "wow". A truly effective mashup makes one wonder why the two songs involved were ever distinct entities.

However, they are difficult to construct well. There must be a strong, underlying sense of accord due to similar chord structure or complimentary rhythm. Similar lyrics will not sustain the piece, and any tertiary material added must endorse what's forged in the basic union. Chaotic Theatre Company could use some tips from Girl Talk. Their theatrical collision of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass in the thematic wasteland of a mental institution is a cacophonous shambles of discordant storyline and one-note performances.

For those of you that didn't have a childhood (or a subversive high school English teacher), the story is basically this: Alice, bored during her sister's droning tutorial, spies a white rabbit in a cute little outfit racing into a hole. She follows him and finds herself in a subterrainian wonderland replete with condescending flora, a cryptic hooka-smoking bug, and a queen whose policy it is to behead the non-obsequious (like you do). She goes back in the second book. More shit happens. It's a dream (or is it?). Great books. Read them.

The challenge to create something fresh and piquing was bound to be, from the offset, grueling; adaptations of Lewis Carrol's best loved works are so common as to have become a sub-genre. The over-literal "she's fucking batshit" angle, with all its supported metaphors, take-able licenses, and typical ignorance of reference to governmental fallacies has been explored variously. An addition to the canon that attempts to combine the two stories and make them converse in this context sets the bar at a respectably high level. However, all the leaping and grasping this production does causes the bar to fall on its head and give it a concussion. It is, as the young folk say, a "hot damned mess".

The piece is jarring, but it rarely works in the manner the orchestrators ostensibly intended. Inexplicably, several scenarios and characters have been removed, most surprisingly the ones that would've provided great nuthouse metaphors and a prickly fluidity (the "Eat Me, Drink Me" situation, the Pool of Tears ordeal, the Mock Turtle, the Walrus, the Carpenter, etc.). It seems as if the company's primary goal is to induce empathy with Alice's burgeoning insanity by deluging the audience with confounding lighting choices, frenetic scene changes, and interaction in the form of breath on necks and pinching of sides. One is being commanded, rather than invited, to follow, which results in audience recalcitrance. Judging by the sporadic deriding snickers during blackouts, the shifting in seats, and a susurration of "Oh, fuck me" from one slumped young man, the play only successfully induced apathy and aggravation in several audience members. And maybe headaches from the copious screaming.

Playing crazy is a challenge in most stage endeavors, and one that Alice! fails to overcome. The piece gets snared on the notion that "crazy" entails screaming a lot and tearing at one's hair while blathering nonsensically. If 60 Minutes exposés have taught us anything, it's that this isn't entirely untrue, but crazy on-stage is different from actual crazy, as it requires moderation and precision to be convincing. Many performers plummet headlong into the pit of mawkishness and hyperbolic "wackiness".

A few, however, adroitly skirt the void. Natalie Navar and Sabrina Olivia glint as twin shards Tweedledee and Tweedledum, marrying high theatricality with a contorted believability, and the unnamed-in-the-program dude that plays the Cheshire Cat offers a refreshing glee to the proceedings. Periodically, Alexa Doggett's Alice sears with a piquant sincerity that seems to be thwarted often by direction and circumstance. While these performers add a welcome weight to the proceedings, they eventually leave the stage and the audience is vaulted back into the maddening tangle to fend for themselves. Considering the gallumphing nature of the beastly ideas that inhabit it, this tuldgey wood is better left unexplored.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@austinist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • thanks for your share.
  • I agree the show could use some work, especially what goes on during the blackouts, but I thought the overall feel was both frightening and moving.
  • this is a new work. Many new works get "tweaking" after their first run in front of an audience.
  • RElwell

    Not that I care one way or the other, but I really hate seeing people who can't differentiate "whose" and "who's" tearing something apart. Seeing as how close the writing profession is to theater--let alone theatrical adaptation of a literary piece--it seems vaguely hypocritical.

  • ATR

    Wow Bastion. Pretty harsh criticism that I think is uncalled for. I saw Alice! and came away with a completely different impression. I agree the show could use some work, especially what goes on during the blackouts, but I thought the overall feel was both frightening and moving. I truly felt the madness that Alexa Doggett portrayed as she moved back and forth between "Wonderland" and the asylum. Perhaps YOU would have portrayed madness differently, but I thought she did a remarkable job. I also thought the actors playing Dee and Dum were great (very creepy) but I also thought the Queen was well played.



    My understanding is that this is a new work. Many new works get "tweaking" after their first run in front of an audience. I for one hope that happens and Alice! returns so more Austin audiences can experience the strong emotions I felt watching the show.

  • Stunning! Very well done!
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@austinist.com