I Am So Popular: Where The Wild Things Need Psychotherapy


Editor’s note: The views expressed in I Am So Popular are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the outlook or beliefs of anyone else in the IST network.


Months ago Warren sent me a link to the trailer for Where the Wild Things Are. It’s a wonder that, after watching it, I could focus on anything else but while I waited for the films release. For you see WTWTA is not just another book for me. It was my First Ever Favorite Book. I say first ever because, being the voracious reader I am (and have been since first being introduced to the alphabet) of course many other favorites joined the list along the way. Little Women, The Handmaid’s Tale, Of Human Bondage, and about 90,000 others (and that’s the short list—the long list is about two million).

I got WTWTA back in the sixties, not long after it first came out, and Sendak had me at hello. This was not a book I ever forgot or relegated to some dusty heap of childhood memories. Max was and remains the bomb. I’ve read the book hundreds of times (at least) and I think I could, without exaggeration, give that book plenty of credit (or blame?) for my decision, very early on, that I wanted to be a writer when I grew up.

Hell, I didn’t even wait until I grew up. (Wait, have I grown up? God, I hope not.) I began toiling away at the joys and chores of authoring from the time I was at least eight. Literature enthralled me. I grew up in a town of fewer than 3,000, all of us blue collar, few of us aspiring to the academy. The local library was about the size of a pimple on a gnat’s ass, housed in the little building that also held the Police Station. Oh, how I sorted through the limited shelves, devoured like a Wild Thing any tome that would transport me—to another place, another time, another universe (thank you A Wrinkle in Time).


Last year, when I learned that Warren had not had the same love affair with WTWTA when he was little, I went to great lengths to find him a perfect copy, by which I mean one translated into Hebrew, his first language. After much back and forth email haggling, I struck out with the delightfully named Mile C’hai bookstore in Denver, but eventually managed to have a copy delivered from Tel Aviv. There they are, the same Wild Things, being told in another language! So excellent.

So when the movie finally arrived, I had those goddamned expectations—the ones that more often than not lead to disappointment. Okay, to say I was disappointed isn’t accurate. I liked the movie—visually stunning, fantastic soundtrack, brilliant monster costumes, a perfectly portrayed Max. But, well, fuck, I didn’t know, going in, that I would feel more inclined to go back to therapy after the screening than, say, have a rumpus in the street.

I do not want to go getting all spoiler-y on y’all so let me tread lightly here. While I think it was a curious experiment to assign a back story to Max, and to thrust him in a situation that would encourage empathy and foster compassion well… you know, I was really sort of just hoping for more of the same of what I felt the first time I read the book. Which was pure enchantment and escapism. Over the course of nearly forty years of reading it with some regularity, and despite the fact I hold a degree in English which sort of requires that I - as Warren puts it— analyze things “until they suck…” well this is maybe the one work of literature that I always and forever took purely at face value.

A boy.
A tantrum.
A trip to the bedroom.
A self-conjured trip to a faraway and wondrous land.
A return home.
Some cake.
Fin.

Did I need Max’s mom brought to life in the movie, even if she is played by uber-awesome-super-hot Catherine Keener? Did I need to have triggered so many regrets over past parenting errors heaped on me? Was it really necessary to push my abandonment issue buttons so hard? Was it truly crucial that the monsters be given names and voices and grouchy attitudes? No, Nyet, Unh-uh, Ix-nay, Nein.


Now, how else they possibly could’ve stretched it out to a full-length feature without these devices I cannot tell you. And, to be sure, there were some pretty light moments, some added silliness that wasn’t in the book but certainly matched the tone.

I guess what I mean is, if you asked me: Spike, if you didn’t like it, how would you fix it? Hell, I can’t answer that question. I have no idea. I think I’ll just have to travel forth in life holding the book and the movie as entirely separate entities, the former inspiring the latter the way, say, some artificial flavoring is vaguely and allegedly based on the purer source of that flavor.

Here is a picture of me in the theater watching WTWTA: I am in, like, the fourth row, because everybody and their mother got there ahead of me. I am craning my neck. Max is leaving the Wild Things. And they begin to howl, all of them, Max included, in unison. This touched something so deep, so primitive in me, that I just lost it. Tears are streaming down my cheeks. Warren reaches in his pocket and extracts what appears to be a Kleenex and he hands it to me. I’m usually a wipe-snotty-nose-on-sleeve type, but his kindness moves me so I take this offering, grateful for it.

Only after dabbing at my eyes for a few minutes do I realize that this very instrument of dabbing is causing me more pain. Having run out of soft, true, brand name Kleenex, my young hot lover has handed me a scratchy, sandpaperesque napkin. But because I love and trust him, even though I can feel from the first wipe the coarseness of the “tissue,” I’m not making the connection right away that this thing is hurting me. Because Warren would not purposefully do that.


Which, pardon my English Major self, is a pretty good metaphor for what it was like watching that film. Yes, it rather emulated the thing it was supposed to represent. On the surface it looked so much like the thing I wanted it to be. And I don’t think the point was to trick the audience into feeling deeply depressed by the time the credits rolled. But in the end it hurt me more than it soothed me.

I do hope, eventually, I can get back to that Wild Thing place of old that has occupied my heart for so many years. A place where symbolism is banned, monsters are monsters, nobody talks too much, parents stay in the shadows, and there’s a nice piece of cake at the end that does not trigger, say, miserable memories of some birthday ruined. Instead it is just short, sweet, delicious and good, easy to eat in one sitting, leaving nothing but a happy memory in its wake.

Spike Gillespie blogs at www.spikeg.com and KnitBuzz. She's got a couple of slots left in her writing workshop the last weekend of October. Email spikegillespie@gmail.com for details.

Email This Entry


Comments (6) [rss]


Here are two really interesting reviews of the movie. I thought it was fascinating that the director said he was not trying to make a children's film, but rather a film about childhood.

And Spike? I just love you.

http://www.tnr.com/article/books-and-arts/the-movie-review-%E2%80%98where-the-wild-things-are%E2%80%99?page=0,0

http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/article/711000--where-the-wild-things-are-a-joy-for-thinking-moviegoers-of-any-age

I have two words for you, Spike dahlink: Dave Eggers. By which I mean: I knew going in that there was no way I was escaping that theater with dry eyes given the screen play writer!

But yeah, I get it. I've also always loved the book so very much, and it represented something more carefree to me too, and the back story pressed my particular buttons too.

I wasn't sure if I should even see the film, given my own nostalgia for the book-not for my own childhood, but for the early childhood of my daughters-and the NY Times review that it SUCKED. But...if it moved you as much, I need to see it. Catharsis is good for the spirit! Thanks.

user-pic

Spike,

Amazing piece. Kudos.

Please allow me to explain the compliment. Whether intentional or not, you have basically written a review that is about your own art... your own role. You share the same first name with the director, yet your response to the film is similar to that of other people who read your weekly writings on this website and your several published books. Reading your review was like watching another Spike Jonze film, Adaptation.

There's one aspect of Spike Gillespie's writing that celebrates the creative life in Austin. We read about amazing choreographed garbage truck performances with voice-over by sanitation workers. That's the burden-free column we can enjoy, similar to how we all escaped into the Land of the Wild Things while reading the book.

The other Gillespie column carries a gravity. It's like this movie in that it reminds us of the context of our lives. These columns can be about hysterectomies, cheating boyfriends, wayward hitchhiking strippers, and discount foot surgery that requires traveling to Illinois to lay in a bed with a panty-less reptile woman. It's the heavy backstory that you might not have been turning to the Austinist for when you clicked on that bookmark. But it's the depth that keeps her writing from being a naive cheerleading of life in Austin.

I haven't seen the movie yet. I'm nervous.

Seth

I've never thought of the book as escapist, or even particularly enchanting. In fact, it's always produced quite a bit of anxiety for me: parents who punish for things as harmless as chasing the cat and saying "I'll eat you up" to your mother; visiting a place where the creatures do exactly what their told to do; even the wild rumpus was kind of depressing in that its joy was completely localized and didn't carry over into the rest of the book. Plus, when Max gets back to his room, everything is the same as when he left and his food's still warm -- despite his epic journey he can't escape his existence for more than a few minutes. The emotional timbre of the story is as muted and melancholic as its accompanying art.

What I liked about the movie is that it provided a contemporary back story but retained the book's tone: the sensitive, cool, hip, hot, single mother who is too tolerant to actually send Max to his room without supper, and the monsters, who aren't scary ogres but gloomy characters who openly express their depression and who aren't as quick to capitulate to Max's commands. While Sendak's book was about a time when expressions and feelings were strictly controlled and authority was rigid, the movie is about a time when everyone talks about their feelings and hierarchies aren't as sharp. But despite these advances, melancholy pervades. Neither cool moms nor leveled hierarchies nor emotional honesty have been enough to overcome the sadness.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Austinist

Austinist is a news and culture website about Austin, Texas. We publish Monday through Friday, and also maintain a guide to local arts and entertainment events that we call the Weekly IST List.

Editor: Allen Y Chen
Publisher: Gothamist

Recent Comments

Dig It

Contribute

Latest Tip:

where's the public outcry over the condition of waterloo park?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Austinist.

All Our RSS