<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Creationist Movement Loses First Round in Texas Board of Education Battle</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php</link>
<description>All comments for Creationist Movement Loses First Round in Texas Board of Education Battle</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 joshuahuck</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:45:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>huckjoshua@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>huckjoshua@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>davetx</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php#comment-1622958</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php#comment-1622958</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:27:00 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks mdahmus for reiterating that important point in a rational manner (although I don&apos;t think you should have used the word &quot;theory&quot; in your second paragraph, rather perhaps &quot;idea&quot;).  

Those who label &quot;creation&quot; as a theory don&apos;t understand the scientific definition of the term theory.  And if we&apos;re talking about the context of a science classroom, that&apos;s what matters, folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mdahmus</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php#comment-1622891</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php#comment-1622891</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:33:25 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;No, evolution is a scientific theory, which means it must satisfy a lot of serious criteria. This is not the same thing as &quot;I have a theory that...&quot;

Creationism is a theory based on somebody&apos;s idea. Scientifically speaking it&apos;s barely even a hypothesis.

But way to go equating the two. This is how Republicans win, people.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>barenakedfamily</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php#comment-1622678</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/26/creationist_movement_loses_first_ro.php#comment-1622678</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:27:48 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&apos;t evolution and creation both just theories? Teach the kids what&apos;s on the table and let them decide what to &apos;believe&apos;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
