<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: SXSW Interactive Panel Preview: Designing the Future of The New York Times</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/14/sxsw_interactive_panel_preview_desi.php</link>
<description>All comments for SXSW Interactive Panel Preview: Designing the Future of The New York Times</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 beeswing</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:11:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>bstrickland70@sbcglobal.net</managingEditor>
<webMaster>bstrickland70@sbcglobal.net</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>seth</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/14/sxsw_interactive_panel_preview_desi.php#comment-1612007</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/14/sxsw_interactive_panel_preview_desi.php#comment-1612007</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:28:47 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Adapt and embrace the change? Sadly, that means dumbing down to the equivalent of broadcast and web journalism. Welcome to our idiocracy.

Semacodes are nothing more than something to suggest to your publishing bosses when the organization is in a hopeless situation and you want to keep your job a little bit longer. Remember the cuecat?As we lose our print journalism outlets, we lose our depth of understanding. People depending on RSS and twitter are familiar with the news. They don&apos;t understand the news. If you put someone who browses the internet for news content up against a daily newspaper reader in a current events quiz, the internet browser person would get clobbered.Seth&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
