<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Mr. Wynn, Close Up That Gap!</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php</link>
<description>All comments for Mr. Wynn, Close Up That Gap!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 austinist_julie</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:51:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>hohoholden@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>hohoholden@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>LoudMouth</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604862</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604862</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:36:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;According to Sarah Coppola at the Statesman, they voted to close the gap this morning.  

Nice photo, Dick.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>AC</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604259</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604259</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:45:39 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree it&apos;s a foregone conclusion.  I&apos;m irritated that I missed the vote on first reading.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Shilli</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604208</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604208</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:58:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Austin Contrarian has a good post on the latest VMU opt-out:

http://www.austincontrarian.com/austincontrarian/2009/03/complete-and-utter-capitulation.html

I didn&apos;t post on it partly because I think it is a foregone conclusion. Council already voted 7-0 to support the opt-out. Tomorrow&apos;s vote just seals the deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>austinindian</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604198</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1604198</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:53:42 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The small town, short term thinking of the &apos;opt-out&apos; process is unfortunate.  I&apos;m seeing it first-hand in said neighborhood.  We&apos;re not planning for density, but rather sprawl in which we&apos;ll have to drive all over this fair town of ours.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mdahmus</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603583</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603583</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:28:56 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The people behind &quot;Save Town Lake&quot; can be thanked for the excessively large pricetag, since we now know we can&apos;t negotiate with any landowners for strips of trail on the shore.

And the opt-out isn&apos;t just &quot;West Campus&quot; - it&apos;s up Guadalupe and Lamar all the way to 45th. Truly shameful, but it&apos;s what you can expect more of now that Morrison is on the council.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>chachi</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603537</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603537</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:48:08 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;as an avid runner, i love the idea of the expansion. THE problem is cost. initial estimates were $11-15 million, now closer to $25-30 MILLION. its excessive, unnecessary, and while one of the projects that looks good on paper (feels even better), it fails to be &quot;worth&quot; it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kenneth1</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603322</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603322</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:37:14 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I am flummoxed by the opposition to closing this gap from residents &amp; property owners in the area. They apparently don&apos;t like the idea of &quot;strangers runnin&apos; in their propitty.&quot; But I believe it would enhance, not decrease, property values along east LBL.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>tim</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603083</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2009/03/03/this_thursday_along_with_a.php#comment-1603083</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:48:34 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Please! I don&apos;t want to risk my life trying to go through the Statesman parking lot or running along riverside.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
