KXAN, Time Warner Cable Breakup Looking Inevitable

The communications giant and LIN-TV, which owns local NBC affiliate KXAN, have thus far failed to reach an amicable agreement in their ongoing dispute over the subscription fees that TWC pays to carry their signals. The current transmission contract is set to expire at midnight on Thursday, after which KXAN's feed will most likely be removed from Time Warner Cable's broadcast service.
Austinist recently interviewed Eric Lassberg, General Manager at KXAN, who stressed that the "dispute is about fair and equitable treatment."
"Time Warner charges its cable subscribers a fee to provide KXAN-TV in its channel line-up," he said. "It also charges its cable subscribers a fee to provide cable networks, which cable subscribers may or may not watch. Time Warner shares that fee with the cable networks; however, it does not share that fee with us. In essence, it takes our signal for free and resells it for a profit."
Time Warner Cable did not respond to our requests for comment, though a representative told Austin360 TV guru Diane Holloway that the company was "doing everything we can for this not to happen," and that there were "no winners in this situation." Clearly, both sides stand to lose considerably should the breakup happen — KXAN derives approximately half of its viewership from TWC, while the latter will no longer be able to provide certain special events programming such as the Super Bowl and Sunday Night Football.
Austinist reader José wrote in to point out that one way to sidestep this whole controversy is simply to grab the transmission off the air with an antenna. "Satellite and other cable operators are not the only options," he suggested. "I live in Round Rock and I can easily get both Austin and Waco area stations with crystal clear digital transmissions."
Other parts of Central Texas aren't as lucky. A search using TV Fool's coverage lookup tool showed that most transmission towers are roughly five miles away from the 78704 area. In theory this should provide for a good quality signal, but anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. More fruitful paid alternatives include going with Grande Communications, DISH Network, or AT&T's fledgling U-Verse service.
Comments [rss]
-
Aaron Haley
-
forbuschrisjohn
-
LoudMouth
-
MrMichael
-
BeefyLifter
-
seth
-
chesterwakefield
-
tim


