Texas: A Leader In Renewable Energy?

In an unprecedented move being hailed by environmentalists and advocates of energy reform, the Texas Public Utility Committee voted 2 to 1 for preliminary approval of the largest investment in renewable energy in the history of the United States. With 35 states currently producing some sort of wind power, PUC Commissioner Paul Hudson boasted that this new initiative would have Texas—already the leader when it comes to most megawatts produced—generating more than the 14 next-highest states combined.

Criticism has plagued the West Texas turbines because of the lack of a means to carry the energy to homes in denser urban areas like Dallas-Fort Worth. The $4.9 billion plan brings no more wind turbines, and instead seeks to solve the inefficiencies in the current distribution system by installing additional transmission lines.

A little math: right now, Texas produces a little over 5,000 megawatts, with California, in second place, trailing behind with almost 2,500 megawatts. With these new transmission lines in place, the Panhandle turbines would be pumping out some 18,000 megawatts—enough energy to power 4 million homes.

In the Associated Press article, Tom Smith, State Director of consumer group Public Citizen, likened the current transmission line situation to a "two-lane dirt road." Comparatively, he said, the proposed plan would create a "renewable energy superhighway."

"We have all these wind plants up and operating. What we're asking for is the superhighway to get the energy to the cities." said Smith. "This will send signals to manufacturers all across the world Texas is ready to be a world-class player in renewable energy."

Smith also pointed out that Texans will front some of the cost; electricity bills could likely rise by $3 or $4 over the next few years as a result. Final approval will be needed later this year; this is also expected to pass. The transmission lines wouldn't be up and running for another three to five years.

The state has already been leading in producing wind energy mainly due to billionaire oilman T. Boone Pickens, who has already been planning the world's largest wind farm in West Texas, with over 2,700 turbines capable of powering 1.3 million homes. Pickens recently admitted, "I've been an oilman all my life, but this is one emergency we can't drill our way out of." And in a state that's more known for its oil fields, most folks never thought they'd see the day that Texas would become the leader in battling the country's addiction to oil.

Email This Entry


Comments (3) [rss]

What is the cost per khw?
How does that compare to Nuclear? Liquid Coal? Solar? What utilities can will this be available through? What is the average output? Will Texas be power exporter again?

Supposedly wind is now competitive with nat. gas; beats nuclear in the real world (where things like cost overruns and shutdowns actually count); and destroys solar. It doesn't beat solid coal, but liquid coal is a money-loser.

That's all without any subsidies. With a small subsidy for the lack of CO2, it can make coal its bitch.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Austinist

Austinist is a news and culture website about Austin, Texas. We publish Monday through Friday, and also maintain a guide to local arts and entertainment events that we call the Weekly IST List.

Editor: Allen Y Chen
Publisher: Gothamist

Recent Comments

Dig It

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Houston isn't all that bad: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/13/us/politics/13houston.html?_r=1&hp
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Austinist.

All Our RSS