<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Double Take: Austinist Goes Batty For The Dark Knight</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php</link>
<description>All comments for Double Take: Austinist Goes Batty For The Dark Knight</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 austin_allen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:11:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>allen@escapeest.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>allen@escapeest.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>lukequinton</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1416389</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1416389</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:09:51 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Darcie dances like the Penguin from Batman Returns.


&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>leggyblonde</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1414338</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1414338</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:42:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;dance-fight?? do tell!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>lukequinton</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1412966</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1412966</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:30:51 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;d agree with that.  

I think the Tim Burton stuff is good, and I think a lot of people enjoyed it.  A lot has changed since then that has allowed movies about comic books to diverge from peoples&apos; thinking about what the adaptations should look and feel like.

I definitely think the Frank Miller Batman had a big influence on the new stuff.  Probably in style more than substance.  But, interestingly, Miller&apos;s stuff was apparently a big influence for Burton so . . . when it comes down to it, Burton &amp; Nolan just have very different ways of looking at a similar story.  
I don&apos;t think you could have done this movie in 1991.  At least, it wouldn&apos;t have looked like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>reynard</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1412273</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/07/18/double_take_austinist_goes_batshit_1.php#comment-1412273</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:29:30 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;well, I think people who criticize the comic book factor of christopher nolan&apos;s versions overlook the fact that the comic book series changed a lot over time, from something very campy, colorful, and typical to a very dark and surreal experience. Bob Kane&apos;s Batman has as much to do with Frank Miller&apos;s version as Burton&apos;s does to Nolan&apos;s. It&apos;s just a different way of looking at the same characters, and, I think a more truthful way, seeing as how it was always the most anarchistic comic book. It just had to appeal to mainstream readers at the time. You couldn&apos;t have done the dark knight in the 1940s, people would&apos;ve crucified you.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>