<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Cedar Park Family Takes Their Woes to Court</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/01/cedar_park_family_takes_their_woes.php</link>
<description>All comments for Cedar Park Family Takes Their Woes to Court</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Adam S</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:41:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>aschragin@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>aschragin@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>agentpease</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/07/01/cedar_park_family_takes_their_woes.php#comment-1400374</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/07/01/cedar_park_family_takes_their_woes.php#comment-1400374</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:10:46 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I was really shocked when I read the story in the Statesman.  I also saw that the follow-up article was buried inside the newspaper.  The representatives of Field Asset Services knew or should have known better.  The property was not foreclosed and they may have had a work order to enter the property but once they found items of value inside they were supposed to contact someone from EMC and let them know that the property should have been considered occupied because there was probably more than $500 in items present.  That is what they were supposed to do.  I don&apos;t believe they actually donated the items either.  Someone took advantage here.  

Carol Pease
http://www.AustinHomeSafari.com&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>