<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: It&apos;s Official:  Villa Muse Is Dead in Austin</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php</link>
<description>All comments for It&apos;s Official:  Villa Muse Is Dead in Austin</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 austinist_elizabeth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:00:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>newsyoucanuseornot@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>newsyoucanuseornot@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>seth</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356493</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356493</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:45:51 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Another developer has been trying to pull the same land-lock-up maneuver up in Leander. It&apos;s masquerading as the Texas X-Park. 

The scheme:

1. Convince investors to buy into this extreme sports country club concept.
2. Purchase 140 acres of Leander property at today&apos;s market value.
3. Burn through $60 million of investors&apos; money in this implausible money pit.
4. Wait for the investors to beg to cash out at a substantial loss.
5. Developer owns 140 acres of property that has appreciated thanks to suburban sprawl.
6. Profit $$$$!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jamess</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356275</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356275</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:42:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I heard the same story about the developer sending out emails. But, it was when his &quot;boy&quot; was elected mayor. It was referring to Mcracken, who was a strong supporter of this terrible idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>txtoast</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356127</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356127</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:45:17 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I like how that drawing shows the space between Villa Muse and downtown as grey emptiness.

They erased my whole neighborhood!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Slickshu</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356119</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356119</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:40:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Council did the right thing here -- beware the rogue who offers you a deal that you must take now or never.  If a deal is so good, it will still be good after the public has had a chance to chew on it a bit.  A little sunshine should never spoil a development deal.

Interesting that the Villa Muse developer, in a petulent fit, is sending e-mails around town pushing hard for Galindo&apos;s election, implying that he&apos;ll pitch this bad deal again when his &quot;boy&quot; gets on Council.  

Scary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>heyzeus</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356055</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1356055</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:10:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Last I heard, Villa Muse is now in talks with Bastrop.  That way they can take advantage of Austin&apos;s creative capital without having to deal w/ the City of Austin and its ETJ.

http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/cityhall/entries/2008/04/22/city_of_bastrop_courts_villa_m.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Unprofitable</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1355920</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1355920</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:05:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As a musician who rehearses and performs 4-5 nights a week in or near downtown, the idea of moving that far outside the city seemed preposterous to me.

I can&apos;t say that a single one of my peers expressed anything different when the subject of Villa Muse came up.  
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jamess</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1355791</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1355791</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:44:07 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This was such a flop from start to finish. It was never going to happen, and by giving away potential tax-able land wasn&apos;t going to make it happen.

What was going to happen was the land would be given for Villa Muse, and then commercial property would have been built - but without the creative complex.

Thereby giving a developer a free ride on non-annexed land.

And, most of the City Council understood that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JohnM</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1355747</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2008/05/06/its_official_vi.php#comment-1355747</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:15:19 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Beyond the debate of &quot;would this even work,&quot; where else could this possibly work in Texas other than Austin?  Wasn&apos;t half the point of Villa Muse to interact with Austin&apos;s creative capital?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>