The Informed Drinker: In the Beginning, There Was Rum
Why We Don't Like You: Texas A&M Aggies
![Weekend Music Preview: Woven Bones Tour Kick-Off [Beerland / Friday]](http://austinist.com/assets_c/2009/11/beerland_27nov2009_250-thumb-110x110-460924.jpg)
Weekend Music Preview: Woven Bones Tour Kick-Off [Beerland / Friday]
Thief Nabs $10K Flagship Trek Bike From Mellow Johnny's
Government Recalls Cars and Cribs [News Bits]
Travis County added 31,739 residents between July 1, 2006 and July 1, 2007 according to estimates released today by the U.S. Census Bureau. Only eight counties in the country added more, including four in Texas (Harris, Tarrant, Bexar and Collin). On a percentage basis, Williamson and Hays counties were among the fifteen fastest growing counties and Travis was in the top 100.
Austin's comparatively strong economy and low housing prices make it likely that even more people will move here next year. Around 2,000 per year are expected to move into condos downtown (according to economist Ray Perryman, even with everything now being built there aren't enough to meet demand). The other 30,000+ will either move to existing neighborhoods that are increasing density or to new sprawling suburbs surrounding the city strangling the city like a gasoline-fueled robotic python.
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Low housing prices?
Hahahahaha!
Oh dear Stella, housing prices in Austin are low... compared to New York and L.A. which are obviously the standard markets and best indicators for housing prices in America.
That and obviously they're not taking into account property taxes... or stagnant wages... or the lack of available un-specialized jobs.
Agreed, housing prices in Austin are low. As evidenced by my old neighbors, who when they moved in (from California), were estatic to have only paid $600K for 2000 sq. ft house that needed to be remodeled.
Oh yeah, and be sure not to confuse "low housing prices" with "affordable housing prices" - those are two entirely different things.
Wow. Good thing you deleted those first two comments.
I have to admit, the Austinist is much improved, now that you guys just delete whatever you don't like.
Very classy.
They were comments pointing out a typo - I appreciate the help, but they don't make any sense anymore after I fixed the typo. Relax.
Benj, just so you don't feel censored, one comment was:
Austinist's Headlines "AMOUNG" The Worst Online
and yours was
Who's Travis Amoung? Is he Laotian, or Hmong? And why does he get to be a county?
Both very classy.
bitter like a delicious coffee or tasty chocolate...
i like!
It's not even censorship anymore, not when there’s no real axe to grind or keep from grinding. It's so de facto and bland, just the thoughtless elimination of stuff you subjectively deem unfit, or in your case, nonsensical out of context. Bland and *yawn* par for course, apparently. That was my point, and that was all.
Sure, two jokes about a typo may not be the zenith of class, but who would ever know, with so many little fingers hovering over the Delete button?
Thanks for telling me to relax, though.
Benj,
I didn't think the removal of your article about SXSW was necessary, even though I thought some of it was petty (ie, I enjoy SXSW and don't really care what Louis Black does, nor do I necessarily feel the level of bitterness that a lot of Austin feels towards him/his creation/his business). As such, I can totally understand your frustration, resentment, whatever expressed on the drunkensocks blog. And, the double annoyance of Austinist not even allowing your goodbye column to run.
I thought your columns were good reads, particularly in light of how so much of the "new content" every day has become just updates of shit from Google news. They will be missed and the substance of Austinist is diminished because of it.
But, I'm not sure why you're upset re: Shilli's deletion of snarky comments that no longer make sense once the typo was fixed. I suppose the better solution could have been to do a strikethrough of the incorrect word which would have left the comments as funny still. Since that wasn't done, the comments were out of context/nonsensical to those of us who never saw the spelling error.
Why do you people think that deleting somebody’s words and then posting them somewhere else isn’t censorship?
While there is a wide continuum of what should justify censorship, there’s a pretty narrow one on what it constitutes: either your let people speak, or you don’t. I’m not too thick to understand why you deleted the comments. I just can’t remember a time when contributors deleted comments due to relevance. If it’s a site for the public, why delete anything that isn’t hateful or atrocious?
I think you (mistakenly) assumed I wasn’t relaxed because, on some level, you understand that erasing someone else’s input is pretty lame.
Cram: It's not like it's a first amendment issue, and it's only vaguely tied to the reasons I left. But: It should make people uncomfortable with their assumptions of objectivity and free expression (if they have any to begin with) when they write something on a public site, and then -whoosh! It's gone. I know this isn't Budapest 1956 or anything, it's just irks me to carelessly expunge people's voices, even in the least significant contexts, and even when it's part and parcel to a contributor erasing a minor mistake or oversight and then covering his tracks.
I agree that the deletion of your SXSW column was censorship and now I understand your reaction to the deletion of the comments.
And, I appreciate the fact that you actually give a shit about the (alleged) purpose of a site like this.
I make mistakes reasonably often in my posts and sometimes people leave comments with corrections. I generally fix the mistake, send the person an email thanking them for the correction and then delete the comment. I didn't send an email this time because I thought the two comments were mean spirited. I write for Austinist because I am interested in having a conversation about urban development, not about typos, and I think those comments distract from the conversation. This unrelaxed melodrama has shown me that deleting the comments can be a larger distraction, so maybe I will figure out some other way to deal with it.
Benj, I'd have done the same thing on my stupid crackplog too - I don't think it's censorship.
Why do you people think that deleting somebody’s words and then posting them somewhere else isn’t censorship?
Well, for one, because it's not. Please gain at least a high-schooler freshman's grasp on what "censorship" is, then get back to us.
TROLL! TROLL! SOMEBODY CALL THE TROLL PATROL!