About Austinist
Austinist is a website about Austin and everything that happens in it. More about us.

Editor-in-Chief: ALLEN Y CHEN
Publisher: GOTHAMIST
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

who got a new iphone??? [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Your Daily Editor Picks
Coming Soon
Recent Comments
Austinist Recommends
tom150_final.gif

January 25, 2008

New Movie Releases: Teeth, How She Move and Rambo

Teeth
When you are rolling into sexy time with your lady/man friend, there should be an unspoken pact, a treaty, if you will, that both parties will emerge from the lusty lope with their person completely intact. No one wants the menacing mist of mutilation hanging in the air while they've got their pants around their ankles, that is of course as long as both bodies are willing participants in said libidinal ritual. Ah, a catch! In that asterisk lies the core of what the clumsy, campy, cringe-filled Teeth is all about.

Doing her best to ward off the omnipresent urges of her burgeoning sexuality, Dawn, played by the surprisingly good Jess Weixler, is the voice of her local promise ring posse, continually encouraging herself and others to keep the gift of their virginity wrapped in its shiny, um, box, until the day they walk down the aisle. This holy mission is played on for every gag it can get, from the real life slogans on the t-shirts like "I'm worth waiting for", to the creepy, cult-like call and answer chanting at their group meetings, to Dawn repeating the word "purity" to herself when things start to get too hot and heavy.

Unfortunately, remaining "pure" is sometimes a choice that we don't get to make for ourselves, and Dawn's flower is plucked from her by someone who purports to be of her own kind. In the midst of this most extreme betrayal, Dawn plucks a little something herself: the interloper's penis. Like a butterfly flapping its wings in the southern hemisphere, this act sets off a series of events which lead to a carnage carnival like nothing you have ever seen in a movie theater. Severed members are flung about like so many hot dogs at a county fair, blood spews forth from hands and crotches with fire hydrant force, and Dawn comes to the realization that what has grown inside her is a gift more powerful and more terrifying than any superhero could ever imagine.

Teeth is being billed as "the most alarming cautionary tale for men with wandering libidos since Fatal Attraction." However, that assertion would suppose that Dawn is a psychotic bunny boiler with a severe codependent streak, which is not the case at all. Instead, she is a naive, dewey-eyed lamb, trying her best to retain some semblance of purity in a world filled with one-track-mind men, with all trains heading towards penetrationtown. She doesn't want to bite, and if afraid of the mauling mouth inside, but for the good of womankind and other helpless vaginas, she must.

We can't say that the film is great, because it's not, but it is entertaining and we can certainly understand why it got picked up after its premier at Sundance. It contains wacky laugh-out-loud moments, zany one-liners, and a juicy gimmick which has been expertly crystallized by their marketing campaign. Where Teeth fails is in the nuts and bolts of execution. There is definitely a B movie feel to it, especially with the schlocky acting by some of the players, the ridiculous musical score, unbelievable special effects and some forced plot lines (brother with the back-door preference, here's looking at you). But in the end it gets the point across, however clumsily. Ladies and gentlemen, sex is not like storming a castle; you need to ask for permission before you enter. --Steph Beasley [Trailer] [Website]

How She Move By now you've probably seen candy-colored ads all over the 'netz and Myspace promoting How She Move. Based on the advertising campaign alone, it might be easy to write it off as just another slightly corny urban dance drama. And though I have infinite unwavering love for corny, urban, or really any sort of dance drama, How She Move totally transcends corniness on the strength of its style and killer performances by largely untrained actors.

Director Ian Iqbal Rashid (Touch of Pink) had to film the entire movie and its fourteen dance numbers in just twenty-five days with almost no budget, and it still blows away most other teen dance dramas (sorry, Julia Stiles and Nick Cannon.) Shot largely with handheld cameras and unknown actors, it's an indie film tackling one of Hollywood's favorite tropes. Indie or not, it just wouldn't be a proper dance drama without high-stakes, important Life Shit hanging in the balance. In this case, teenaged Raya (Rutina Wesley), daughter of Jamaican immigrants from a rough Caribbean neighborhood in Toronto, hopes to use her step-dancing prowess to win money to go back to private school. Her upwardly mobile family made it out of the ghetto for a while but just went broke caring for her drug-addicted sister, who died of an overdose. Raya finds herself back at her old school, surrounded by a bunch of former classmates who aren't impressed by her erstwhile flight to the middle class. When her childhood friend/rival Michelle (Tre Armstrong) throws a bunch of stank attitude her way, Raya bucks up and dusts off her long-dormant dance moves for a good old-fashioned dancefight. It's the first of Move's many totally nuts dance sequences (set quite brilliantly to Busta Rhymes' "Touch It"!) The dancefight turns ugly at the end, but Raya's moves earn the admiration of local step squad leader Bishop (Dwain Murphy) and she fights for a place on his team hoping they can take the $50,000 prize at the StepMonster championships in Detroit.

In lesser hands, the film would still be pretty awesome based on its choreography alone--the dance sequences are the true star of the show. We're treated to hypnotic all-girl step teams in shiny outfits, classic black-fraternity-style stepping (with canes!), and B-Boy City-esque hyperathletic routines. The music rules, too--it's Missy Elliot anthems mixed with a whole bunch of Jamaican dancehall. But the ensemble cast truly almost steals the show from the dancing. As the sweet but guarded Raya, Rutina Wesley projects the perfect mixture of vulnerability and ambition. She knows she's her parents' last hope after the death of her sister, and her big, downcast eyes reflect the frustration of trying to keep it together amidst crappy circumstances. Her tough real-girl appeal recalls Michelle Rodriguez in Girlfight. Tre Armstrong is equally strong as party-girl Michelle, resigned to an existence of smoking blunts and playing video games (and pretty heated about the fact that Raya's reaching for something more.) Dialoguewise, it's a pretty nice change of pace to hear Move's Caribbean-Canadian characters slipping in and out of Jamaican patois instead of whatever watered-down catchphrases Hollywood usually dreams up for young black actors to speak. The gritty handheld cinematography also works in the movie's favor, effectively conjuring the grim concrete winter in Toronto and, in turn, the eye-popping contrast of the step spectacle. If you're a dance-movie fan at all, see How She Move post-haste, and if you're not, see it anyway--what better cure for the late January doldrums than some big-screen dancefights? --Molly McCommons [Trailer] [Website]

Rambo After twenty years, John Rambo is back. This time (as if it really matters) he’s on a rescue mission in Myanmar, where a group of Christian aid workers has gone missing and are presumed kidnapped. But Rambo’s not alone—he’s part of a team of mercenaries hired to find the abducted Americans. And though they’re all technically on the same team, tensions run high as the quasi-good guys are forced to take on the sadistic military junta in the embattled jungles of Burma.

We should make two things perfectly clear right now: first, we love the Rambo franchise, and second, we love seeing shit blow up. L-O-V-E. Rambo was, in some ways, the ultimate over-the-top action series, and we were ecstatic to hear that Stallone was brining it back after nearly twenty years.

So how is it, then, that the fourth coming of Rambo—America’s ultimate action hero—left us feeling so deeply unsatisfied? Oh sure, it’s got all the basic ingredients: brooding good guys, foreign bad guys, huge explosions and flying dismembered limbs. But where First Blood II and Rambo III had a highly developed (albeit cartoonish) sense of good vs. evil, Rambo (the first in the series to be entirely written and directed by Stallone) feels more like violence for violence sake—nastiness for the sheer, shameful thrill.

Obviously, earlier Rambo films could be just as easily criticized for their exploitative nature. Hell, Rambo III was, for a time, considered the “most violent film ever made” by the Guinness Book of World Records (who counted 221 acts of violence and 108 casualties). But despite the trigger-happy similarities, the newest Rambo just feels meaner than its predecessors. Every single death is lingered on a bit too long, CGI-enhanced a bit too much and contextualized far too little, with both the heroes and the villains so thinly drawn that you end up not really caring who dies—only that someone dies, and that it be sufficiently gory.

Before you start to think we’re overanalyzing a mindless action flick, consider this: in the first (and by far the best) installment in the Rambo series, a grand total of one person is killed. With a rock. By accident. And while First Blood had its share of action, the film was, at its heart, a fully realized drama with a convincingly human bad guy (played brilliantly by Brian Dennehy). Conversely, we couldn’t even tell you what the bad guy’s name is in Rambo—we don’t know him enough to hate him, and in the end his death carries the same emotional weight as the hundreds of other useless deaths.

Stallone tries to excuse Rambo’s apparent lack of purpose by tacking on a jumbled montage of raw, real-life footage from the civil war in Myanmar. But don’t let that fool you into thinking that he’s serious about shining a spotlight on the country’s plight, because he isn’t. In fact, after that initial sixty seconds of explanation, the story could just as well take place in any other war torn country with almost zero dialog changes. --Matt Smith [Trailer] [Website]

Also Opening in Austin This Week
Meet the Spartans
U2 3D
Untraceable

[Showtimes]


Email This Entry







Advertisement: Austinist Continues Below!

Comments (11)

With all due respect, I must inform readers that this critique was not written by a red-blooded Rambo fan. A true patriot wouldn't have bundled this review as a footnote beneath two chick-flick reviews, especially while America is at war. Sylvester Stallone has produced not a 'new' Rambo film, but the LAST Rambo film. Like Rocky Balboa, Stallone did right while closing out this franchise, and he doesn't deserve this dis.

Steph is an entertaining writer, but it's her myopic view of this movie that's keeping her words from the paper-printed pages people pay to read. John Rambo isn't without shortcomings, but they're not what Steph is claiming. There is no need to display the human side of this bad-guy. Unlike Bryan Denehey's character (who is just a hick-town sheriff) in First Blood, Rambo is battling a genocidal army led by a child molester. Did Speilberg properly humanize the concentration camp warden in Schindler's list? Do you remember his name?

It doesn't matter who he's fighting, where, or why. This movie is about John Rambo resolving his alienation from America, putting away war, and returning home.

The foremost problem of the film, for me, were the CGI graphics used to reduce production costs. The faux big-boom betrays the tradition of Rambo running away from huge gasoline-fueled fireballs of his own making. Here's a little film making tip for directors who are considering using CGI blood and exit wounds to avoid the re-wardrobing expense of multiple takes: put the blood on first, cover it with CGI green camoflage, then after the gunshot, yank off the CGI cover-up to reveal the gruesome aftermath. The audience scrutinizes theatrical wounds for realism, they don't study pre-shot torsos for digital masking.

Bottom-line, this is the best Rambo after First Blood. The flashback montage was worth the price of admission alone. Welcome home, John. We missed you.

Seth

 

Oh, crap. I meant Matt, not Steph. Sorry for the confusion.

Seth

 

Man, I wish I had written that review of Rambo, 'cause I think Math is right on with this one. This installment of Rambo is about exploding, seemingly spring-loaded bodies and not much else. If this is supposed to be about John Rambo "putting away war", apparently the only way to do that is to kill everyone in sight.

Don't get me wrong, I was entertained, but I was left hungry for something more, story-wise. It seems like the only thing that will draw people to this film is nostalgia.

Oh, also, Teeth and How She Move are not chick flicks. 27 Dresses is a chick flick, but I can't comment on that movie because I will never see it, nor would I wish that kind of pain and suffering on anyone.

 

Oh, Seth--brave defender of mediocre movies. Where to start?

First: "[Matt] is an entertaining writer, but it's [his] myopic view of this movie that's keeping [his] words from the paper-printed pages people pay to read." Ouch! Wait... like the Chronicle? Or the Statesman? Or Ebert and Roeper? Oh wait... people don't pay to read those reviews either. In fact, if you're paying to read any movie reviews at all, you're a sillypants. It's all on the internet these days, my man.

Second: The SS officer in Schindler's list was named Goth. And yes, he was played awesomely by Ralph Fiennes. It could also be argued that the real villain in Schindler's list was Hitler--a guy who hardly needs charaterizing at all. But that's completely irrelevant because Schindler's list was a biopic, not a balls-out action movie. Duh.

Third: If this movie is about "John Rambo resolving his alienation from America, putting away war, and returning home," then only the credit sequence is worth keeping. And it's telling that you think one of the best scenes is a flashback to the earlier films.

Fourth: I agree... the effects sucked.

 

Math,

The flashback is this movie's lynchpin that spoon-feeds the viewer Rambo's struggle. The only voice during the montage is the Colonel pleading with Rambo that 'the war is over. Come home Johnny.' You might recall that Rambo's response is, 'Nothing is over until I say it is.' Apparently, it took twenty-plus years, and all the blood and bullets of this fracas for him to make up his mind that it truly is over.

I'm not saying this is the best action movie, but it is better than Rambo 2 & 3. John Rambo also doesn't deserve to have his opponents criticized for lacking human details. Few movies pass that test, and none of them are action films of the Rambo caliber.

Steph, from the perspective of a red-blooded Rambo fan, "Teeth" and "How She Move" are chick flicks, plain and simple. It is a dishonor to our veterans who watched their friends die face-down in the mud of Vietnam to have readers scroll down to Math's panning of John Rambo. Teeth is a horror adaptation of a Massingill ad. Some woman doesn't feel fresh 'down there' and has all these hang-ups about exposing lovers to her foulness. The story exaggerates it for theatrical effect and replaces odor with teeth. And the teen dance movie, Please! Kevin Bacon and Chris Penn might have fooled some of us into thinking dancing could be rebellious in Footloose, but we've wised up since then. To put these reviews even on the same page as a Rambo review... you might as well go out to Bergstrom and shout "Baby Killer!" at our boys as they return from Iraq.

Seth

 

Seth,

In our future new release sections, which we do pretty much every week, we'll be sure to think of the veterans when deciding our sequencing.

And, I can appreciate your Rambo fanaticism. My dad would have felt the same way, and that is saying something, 'cause my dad totally kicked ass.

But I would love to watch you tell the people who Step that dancing is only for "chicks" and carries no hint of rebellion. These are dance battles, my friend!

And I'm not even going to start on how off you are about Teeth, because, well, you would never believe that there are thematic parallels that can be drawn between it and the Rambo franchise.

-Steph

 

Seth:

Uh, Yeah. 'Speilberg' [sic] did humanize the 'warden' of the death camp. His name was Amon Goethe, played by Ralph Fiennes. (Why is the top down? I'm fucking freezing.") He wasn't just fully-fleshed, he was almost charmingly flawed, borderline sympathetic and completely human.

First Blood is the only watchable Rambo film. Period. Your fatherland kitsch can hit the bricks.

Fans of the Rambo franchise aren't red-blooded. Although they might be suffering from hypoxia.

 

Dear Austinist Writers,

I'm going to have to back Seth up on his criticism of your review of the last(not the new) Rambo film. Before I begin, let me make a couple of things clear so you know where I'm coming from: 1. I, too, am a big Rambo fan. 2. I consider First Blood to be the best of the series with the new release coming in second.

OK, that said, your main criticism of the movie seems to be that there is not enough story and the violence is excessive.

Ok, although I think this movie can stand on its own, anyone going to see this is probably going to be familiar with the back story on John Rambo so there isn't a lot of need to even focus on that in this movie. So, Stallone chose to get right down to business in this movie. Great! Good call Sly! I'm backing him up on this one.

As far as for your criticism of the movie being too violent. Nothing confuses me more than when people get upset at something for being exactly what it is. Rambo was violent? Hell yes it was! It's supposed to be. You even said in your review that it was "the ultimate over the top action series." So why are you slamming the movie for delivering on what's expected of it? What's next, a review of an AC DC concert where you complain the sound it too loud?

The big head scratcher for me is that you claim to "L-O-V-E" the Rambo franchise, but then you slam the movie. Note to all rambo fans out there: you will not be disappointed by this final installment of the Rambo franchise. Is it perfect? No. Do I have criticisms? yes. But overall Rambo delivers. And yes, in a VERY violent way. Probably the most gory action film I've ever seen. This will probably take over that Guinness Book record for most casualties and violent acts category.

So yeah, just to let you know, you're not a real Rambo fan. I AM. And so is Seth.

Thanks for you time,

kevin.

 

Before I was informed that the Coen brothers had another movie out, I thought No Country For Old Men WAS the title for the new Rambo film. Irony abounds.

 

Steph,

Step-dancing as battles? Perhaps if we sent some of these guys over to Iraq we could have things wrapped up in time for the Super Bowl. Oh, wait. Men dancing with each other would be such an unconventional weapon the United Nations might sanction us. Not to mention the confusion it would cause regarding the don't-ask-don't-tell policy.

Seth

 

Apparently for some people, high-context, vapid franchise films are what pass for long-term relationships.

Rambo fans: Why don't you just watch soap operas?

Oh, right. You're homophobes.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.