Quantcast

Austinist Movie Review: Juno

Full disclosure: we wanted to like Juno, long before it was released. We knew we would like it from the very first stirrings of online teaser previews. The cast alone was enough to make us giddy.

Ellen Page? Brilliant
Allison Janney? She’s our hero
Jason Bateman? Want to have his babies
Michael Cera? See above re: the babies (don't look at us like that, he's legal)

So, we had extremely high hopes. In truth, it’s lovely and not quite perfect, but we’re willing to overlook the imperfections because there is just so much goodness in this movie.

Most of you know the plot by now: girl and boy are high school best friends, girl and boy have sex, girl gets pregnant, girl has to deal with consequences. Notice we said “girl,” not “girl and boy,” because this movie is all about Juno’s journey. Ellen Page imbues the character with toughness, a sassy intellect, and an underlying vulnerability that she owns with her whole being. We adored Page in this role. It’s hard not to, unless you just don’t have a soul.

Mild-mannered Paulie Bleeker (Cera), the father of the fetus, is too young to know what to do. Both of these kids are. But before you can chastise Paulie for being a deadbeat teen dad, watch closely the scene in which Juno tells him she’s pregnant. The emotions registering on his face are subtle but priceless; it’s obvious that his mind is exploding with shock and panic and who knows what else, yet he stays. The role is a great one for Cera, who is regarded for his impeccable delivery and awkward humor, and it reinforces the fact that he can actually, you know, act. His very first words to pregnant Juno are, “What should we do?” That word, “we,” says everything about his character. He’s kept out of the loop, mostly by Juno, throughout the film, but when we do see Paulie his love for Juno quietly radiates.

Juno is faced with a decision: get an abortion, or tell her parents (played by J.K. Simmons and Janney) and have the baby. It’s interesting how abortion is treated in film these days; it’s an option, sure, but rare is the character that goes through with it. However, the script doesn’t try to be preachy or take sides. After a rather uncomfortable experience at the clinic, Juno decides to have the baby and give it up for adoption. Enter Vanessa (Jennifer Garner) and Mark Loring (Bateman), an upper-middle class couple that Juno and her friend contact, thanks to an ad for adoptive parents in the PennySaver. Vanessa and Mark seem like the perfect option for Juno’s baby – of course, there’s another side to every perfect couple. A really nice buildup occurs around the relationship between Juno and the Lorings, and just when you think the film will go in one direction, the plot turns and doesn’t become exactly what you were expecting.

Director Jason Reitman (Thank You for Smoking) is almost as heavy-handed with certain elements of the film as screenwriter Diablo Cody is with some of the "hip" dialogue. He’s aiming for indie-cred, so be prepared for some rudimentary animation, discussions about who listens to better music, and a soundtrack that features somewhat obscure artists like The Moldy Peaches and the less-obscure-but-still-totally-indie Belle and Sebastian. The attempts at “quirky” occasionally detracted from the film’s better points, but most of the time it shines. In the end, Juno’s enduring sweetness, laugh-out-loud honesty and flawless cast melted our cold, black heart.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@austinist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • heyzeus

    I'd just like to add that I liked the movie overall and its performances are strong. But the soundtrack was like a cheese grater of grating gratiness. After it was over, I felt like taking a long immersion bath in music by people that can actually sing. If Juno claims to love Patti Smith and the Stooges so much, why does the soundtrack focus entirely on bedroom-accoustic warbling?

  • oh steph

    Alright, I can respect those views, and partially agree with them. When Rainn Wilson uses the word "homeslice" at the beginning of the film, I really thought it was going to be aweful, but I ended up loving these adorable characters and their wacky quirks (orange tic tacs, I mean, seriously?).



    Bre - I recognize that you didn't hate it; I was more talking to M.O. and debi.



    Mostly I loved it for the squirm-inducing Michael Cera upper thigh shots, but then, I am a dirty old woman....



    Perhaps Diablo Cody won't be so precious and uber-hip in her next outing....we can only hope.

  • debimama

    oh steph – I personally think a movie should be about the story, not the writer. For me, it's impossible to suspend disbelief and really get into a story if the writer's voice is screaming from the screen - from the mouth of every character. Well, maybe it's alright for a movie like Dumb and Dumber or whatever, but this movie is trying to be much more. The pointless pop-culture soliloquies and the super-indie everything else, just killed it for me. I felt like I was being slapped in the face with super-uber-duper hipness with a artificial heart.

  • Bre

    Hey, I said I liked it. Never said I hated it. The actors ARE wonderful - they made the dialogue work. I'd watch this movie again, and probably again after that. I just don't think it's, you know, the BEST MOVIE EVER.



    I'm right there with you re: Paul Dano. That kid will break your heart. In a good way.

  • oh steph

    Jeez, you people hate this movie for exactly what I loved about it. It is unapologetically aiming for quirky. And I don't care if "quirky" is synonymous with deperately grasping for "indie-cred" straws, as long as it makes me laugh and keeps me entertained. I love this movie for the same reason I love all other absurd indie comedies, for the fact that you know that people don't actually act/talk like this (I mean, all of the dialogue between the mom and the dad is completely unbelievable and yet utterly charming) and for the fact that these characters are somewhat approachable and identifiable.



    And if writers keep making movies like this one and little miss sunshine, pole vaulting wonderful actors like Paul Dano into totally unhip, un-navel gazing epics like There Will Be Blood, then please, let them spew their blogger guts all over the screen.



    I guess I am just too optimistically naive to hate preciousness. I also really like kittens and babies.

  • debimama

    My pleasure. There just wasn't anything redeeming about this flick for me. Way too masturbatory. But themo pretty much said what needed to be said.



    Sorry for the unintentional multiple posts.

  • smack

    I just want to say that I love you guys. Esp. because everyone and their dog talks like this is some amazing movie, when it's EXACTLY themo's review. Like, spot on, man.

  • Bre

    Yeah, notice I didn't say it deserves a Golden Globe or something. I feel about this movie the way I felt about Little Miss Sunshine: great cast, some heartfelt/funny moments, overall not a bad flick. But it shouldn't be winning any awards.



    And debimama, thanks for chiming in. Opinions truly are like a**holes - everybody's got one.

  • themo

    Waaay to precious for its own good, including the music. The affected 16 year-old talking like the coolest kid in history was just too overwrought. Sounded like the script was written by a blogger in her 30s trying to rewrite her own past as being the coolest kid in the history of hipdom. Bateman was good. Totally Lance Armstrong of a movie, read: overrated. Happy to see you writing some more, bre. Top 3 most overrated of 2007

  • debimama

    Even this tempered review overrates this crap-bag of a movie.

  • debimama

    Even this tempered review overrates this crap-bag of a movie.

  • debimama

    I thought it sucked.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@austinist.com