Appears to be a fully formed, cohesive unit as far as I can tell. There's a vaguely informative article about them here:

http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=343616

A little worried that I wasted $20 but I suspect it will be pretty good.

I dunno, Paris was sort of famous in 2001. She was in Zoolander as herself.

IMHO, Vincent Gallo is a Warholist hack. And he's ideologically repugnant. To wit:

"...most of Gallo's fans probably also don't know that he's a Ronald Reagan-loving, full-blooded right-wing reactionary. Or maybe he wouldn't describe himself in those words, preferring instead to call himself a 'Constitutionalist.' Still, the awe with which Gallo describes Newt Gingrich or the glee with which he decries drug treatment programs paints a pretty stark political portrait....

'When I say I'm conservative, that's being radical, that's moving forward in a real way,' said Vincent. 'Liberals are small-minded manipulators; they pander to special interest groups just for the sake of power. Don't you find it odd that if you segregate women, blacks, homosexuals and Jews, they vote in such radical numbers in one party? Where's the balance there?'"

Passion without information is the hallmark of liberal radicalism and it's just as dangerous as conservative radicalism. It's easy to take one thing that Gallo says and make it sound as though that's all there is to him, he says a lot of things that make people angry and of course those are the only things that will reach uninformed ears because media loves negativity. it's also easy to call someone who is very accomplished (he ran away from home at 15 and became a well-known and respected and very successful musician, photographer, motorcycle racer, film maker and basically anything else you can name - and he started with absolutely nothing) a Warholist hack and make him sound as though his work ought to be dismissed. He's not a hack, and people who are actually familiar with his work wouldn't call him Warholist. Finally, it's easy to cry out "HE'S A REPUBLICAN" and have a thousand other small-minded people stamp him with the republican stamp and then every beautiful thing he creates is tainted by that knowledge.
It's fine to dislike Gallo's sensationalism (and that's all that is, sensationalism -- if you look at all of the things he's said and then see that his best friends are gays and jews you'll realize how obvious it is that he want to get a rise out of you). I also support disliking his aesthetic or his music -- both are occasionally masturbatory and predictable, but I am sick of hearing from everyone who knows nothing about Vincent Gallo that he is a horrible person not worth the time it takes to go out and see something you've never seen or heard before. Even if you don't like the music, this show is the first of its kind - and for a show with no setlist to be featured on MTV news and other big music is revolutionary and evidences that music is finally getting the chance to part from production company pop charts and is becoming more progressive-- I don't think it should be missed regardless of your prejudices.

Let's not bring polka into this argument. Also, Hitler's art sucked (perspective, hello?)

I'm surprised, in a good way, by the reactions to this post. Gallo could certainly be construed as a hard man to like, but for all his pretensions and egomanica I think it's a stretch to call him a Social Darwinist. The guy's a downtown New York artiste, and he's selling his sperm on the internet for $1 million, so I would take any outrageously bigoted comments he's made with a bucket of salt.

Warhol was a mediocre printer whose approache propelled him into mediocre stardom. Timing is everything.

And Gallo is the glossy-cover indie wannabe Miles Davis of Monday, December 3 in Austin, Texas. He's a derivative dillettante who's had his best successes when creating controversy.

I'm frankly bored.

Not that it wasn't already obvious but... straight from the mouth of the man himself.

VG: Yep. All people are simply earthlings. To think of us any more segregated than that is buffoonery. OK, let's say human beings – you want to go that far? We're human beings, OK. To break it up into gay, black, African-American, Native American, vegan, vegetarian, raw-foodists, you know Buddhist, raw-foodist, vegan, homosexual, African-American, whatever it is that you decide to create for your identity in this mental world, which has nothing to do with your soul anyway. It's so embarrassing to me that I've created, let's say, a vocabulary or a character that sort of mocks and mimics that stuff, because the only thing I find entertaining about it is in humor. ... So I play this role. I use these slurs or these outlandish concepts, which are so obviously meant to be funny or absurdist, at least absurdist. No hate group has ever reached out to me. No gay-bashers, no homophobes, no nationalist, no right-wing Republican, no, you know, Christian, whatever you guys think I am. Whatever it is. None of them, people defined as the black shadow, have ever reached out to me in camaraderie. No one's ever written me an e-mail and said, "I'm a racist, too; I really like your website," or "I hate gays, too; you're a genius." What I do get, though is the most hateful spewing, horrifying, horrifying violent threatening ugliness from the socialistic idealists or the people who are caught up in protests, in righteousness. The most ugliness that you've ever read in your life. In your life. You know like: "I'm a fag, man. I've read what you wrote ... and I'm really offended. I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU, MAN!" Like that.