Radio IST List: Graham Williams
Snapshots: Local Music Is Sexy
![Austinist's Will Mills Gets Dunked For Charity [Video]](http://austinist.com/assets_c/2009/11/austinist_capture_03-thumb-110x110-456199.jpg)
Austinist's Will Mills Gets Dunked For Charity [Video]
Bibles and Rhymes: An Interview with Why?'s Yoni Wolf
Austinist Panel Part of Latest SXSW Interactive Additions
- After all that this morning, no one was found inside McBride's after the police got in.
- Over the weekend, a Hays County deputy found 730 pounds of marijuana when he pulled over a Suburban in Buda.
- LaBare trying to get permits to set up shop off of Braker and IH35; the neighbors aren't too excited about it.
- Cops on the lookout for woman (and two accomplices) who robbed a Northwest Austin bank today.
- TxDOT releases Trans-Texas Corridor study.
- Texans don't like vanity plates -- or is it that we don't like paying for vanity plates?
- Coming soon to Borders @ the Domain: TVs. Because shopping for books isn't entertaining enough.
Extra Extra
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebookComments (7) [rss]
Post a comment (Comment Policy)
Tips
Fun Fun Fun Fest
Contribute
Latest Tip:
ACL Fest is full of shit. http://www.austin360.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/music/entr
[more]
Looking at that giant highway is really depressing.
Shilli, even though we passed Prop 12 (was I right about that or what?), we'll never have enough money to build the TTC before oil gets too expensive to make it worthwhile. That, at least, there's no real reason to fear. On the other hand, any day now expect the bleating about eliminating the gas tax to begin (and extra points when you identify many people among that group as the same folks who previously said they wanted a higher gas tax instead of tolls).
1200 feet wide?
At 1200 feet wide, Texas will basically be forced (over time) to have two biologically distinct ecosystems when the wildlife populations are split. Why do I get the sinking feeling that no matter how much environmental research is done, they'll just ignore the fact that this thing is going to bisect the migratory paths of any number of large and small animal species? (Instead, they'll focus on pollution runoffs, etc)
What a waste.
Interesting article in this week's New Yorker about tar sands mines in Alberta:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/11/12/071112fa_fact_kolbert
Basically, projects like this (and similar coal-to-liquid projects in the U.S.) are going to keep supplying gasoline long after light sweet crude runs out. Prices will be higher, but probably not enough higher to stop sprawl/highway development and not enough higher to enable development of non-carbon based energy. Carbon emissions will continue to rise - probably even faster than they are rising now, because producing gasoline from this stuff requires much more energy than producing gasoline from oil.
Peak oil isn't about oil running out - it's about next year having fewer barrels pumped than this year. And yes, $8/gallon (in current dollars) would be enough to make the TTC a non-starter.
Tar sands are a joke anyways. So much water and power input required that you basically need to build a couple of nuclear power plants on site.
It sounds like they are building nuclear reactors on site (at least one). The Canada tar sands field discussed in the article already has output of a million barrels of synthetic crude a day, expected to double by 2010 and triple by 2015.
Yes, even with the nuclear reactors and huge water inputs, though, their output has already been factored into most of the more realistic peaker scenarios (i.e. they replace 5m bpd, but crude goes down 10m bpd, for instance).
http://beastsbelly.blogspot.com/2005/08/tar-sands-will-save-us.html