October 12, 2007
Radiohead's Nasty Habit of Turning the World Upside Down
You've probably been bludgeoned to miserable death via hype on this one. Who knows, maybe you even sat motionless and glassy-eyed at your computer, click-clicking your way through the purchase and download process, battling all the while against ever-threatening website overload. Gasp! There's no way in god's green Great Britain that you could pay as much as you want for the new record, is there? Well, yes sir, there is.
Radiohead, the mystery marvels who somehow bridge the gap between the masses and the song-snobs, yesterday released their new album, In Rainbows, sans record deal—and all the production costs and industry bigwig coffer-stuffing that go along with it. Available for download on a bare-bones website in classic Radiohead styling, the new album splashed onto the scene in a flurry of excitement unabashedly not limited to the music itself. In fact, it’s quite possible that the buzz around their distribution method has made the songs themselves almost afterthoughts.
The revolutionary direct-to-fan approach bypasses the middle man and allows the band to connect to their listeners in a “but how much do you really love me” sort of way. But unlike in the world of paranoid teenage lovers, in the music industry you have to be hugely famous and have some serious balls to get away with stuff like this. By shirking the record label, In Rainbows signals yet another death knell for the industry-as-it-was, a faceless monolith best known for filing lawsuits against thirteen-year-olds and coercing fresh-faced bands into trading in those nasty little sound experiments for some good old fashioned three-chord radio-readies. And when a major label moneymaker like Radiohead goes all turncoat on the evil empires, it’s clear that the future is indeed upon us.
So what’s the backlash of all this? Well, certainly this sonic boom has its tiny bumps, too, as the download quality is less-than-supreme (160 kbps) and they are also offering (via the same website) a veritable cornucopia of goodies in a pricey “tangible” purchase; not only that, but they do have early 2008 plans of signing a record deal ostensibly to get the album into more of those grubby little hands. Ultimately, though, their kindly gamble is a huge deal and sign of things to come, as it makes people ask semi-uncomfortable questions about what exactly music is worth to them, and whether the CD is soon to join 8-tracks and cassette tapes in that great big audio dumping-pit in the sky. But perhaps more than anything, it proves that Radiohead, a band comprised of no spring chickens, is still as forward-thinking as ever.
Check out this interview with Jonny Greenwood on our sister site.
Click here to "steal" In Rainbows.






Nine Inch Nails is putting out their new record without a label, too. But Radiohead beat Reznor to it, just like they beat everyone.
I really hope this is a catalyst for change among how bands get their music to the people.
I'm not an expert on the biz, but it seems like Radhiohead should be getting similar returns if they put it out on a major?
Granted, they don't have the advertising that major labels can provide and sure, there are people (present commenter not excluded) who put down close to the bare minimum purchasing price.
But still, more people have to be buying this simply because it is such a novel idea. Plus, after iTunes, the labels, packaging, etc recoup all the costs, wouldn't the bands get about the same amount of money if they just put out the record themselves and kept the money?
This is a really good album, too.
It's funny because while it may seem that Radiohead would lose money by letting people pay what they want for Rainbows, they will actually make money because so many people would have just illegally downloaded it anyway. At least now they have an option to pay instead of just feeling guilty. Or feeling nothing at all.
And the CD is so last decade.
They released it on the 10th, not yesterday.
I paid for my download yesterday and still haven't received it. It shows up on my bank account, yet still no email. Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this.
There's a PHD in this mess somewhere. Or perhaps it's more spiritual. If given the opportunity, in a more or less anonymous way, will people spend their hard-earned cash to support a band they love? Or will they take the album gratis? Like pinching weed out of your friend's stash because you know where he keeps it and he wouldn't mind if you asked him, so you'll just take a little nugget. He sure as hell won't miss it. Fucking stoner.
No, I pre-ordered, got my email the morning of the release and had no problem downloading at like 8am. I've heard they've had server issues though.
It might be in your spam folder.
There have been some problems with them keeping the site up, but if you bought it after the release there should have been a link straight to download after you paid (or didn't pay).
Even though that server stuff sucks, the album seems a little unfinished. It's just not as risky as their old stuff.
I've heard of some people paying like a hundred for it.
This article says that the distribution method has overshadowed the music, and I'd have to agree. I've heard people all over town talking about getting the album for free if they want, but I've heard hardly anyone talking about the music. I've never been a Radiohead person, but I paid them five for the download just because they were risky.
#5 I paid for my download and never received an email on the 10th. I emailed some support addy and then I received 3 download codes.