http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php All comments for Extra Extra en-us 2009 Adam S Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:41:20 -0600 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss aschragin@gmail.com aschragin@gmail.com 60 http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217323 http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217323 Comments Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:45:23 -0600 <p>Giuliani’s starting to look like an alien. </p> http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217171 http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217171 Comments Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:31:51 -0600 <p>#1: but, but, someone might make money if a variance was granted. Also, we fear change- there should be buildings 20 feet from the lake, just like there was when the Armadillo was open down the street.</p> http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217158 http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217158 Comments Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:01:30 -0600 <p>10 highschool football players have staph infections????? holy SHIT!!!!!!! why isn't CNN on this!!??? and do you get some kind of a compensation when the judge makes an 'oops'? </p> http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217041 http://austinist.com/2007/10/10/extra_extra_43.php#comment-1217041 Comments Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:00:19 -0600 <p>The lakeshore with CWS's variane would give Austin more hike-and-bike trail with a 150ft setback. The lakeshore without CWS's variance gives Austin no hike-and-bike extension and buildings 20ft from the shore. Now, which one sounds better?</p>