September 24, 2007
Genesis and Catastrophe

Editors’ note: The opinions and ideas expressed in The Accidental Gentrifist are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the outlook and belief of anyone else in the Ist network.
Most rambling Texans I know have long grown tired of lamenting to friends in Europe and on our opposite coasts how the Bushes aren’t really Texans. Yes, I’ve seen him clear brush. Yes, I’ve heard him speak. But it doesn’t change the fact that W. was born in Connecticut, that his father was born in Massachusetts, and that both are products of a wealthy and powerful New England social class.
If you want the nitty-gritty, the millions his grandfather Prescott Bush used to start their Texas energy empire were primarily from a single share he held in the company he also directed, the Union Banking Corporation, which was founded by his daddy in law, George Herbert Walker. Of course, Prescott (and at least 6 other U.S. senators) had to wait until after WWII to dissolve UBC and cash in their shares—because the company had been seized following FDR’s Trading with the Enemy Act, a response to the sudden public knowledge that U.S. companies had been (thus far legally) trading with Nazi Germany. It turned out UBC had strong connections to a Dutch bank owned by Fritz Thyssen, Adolf Hitler’s main fundraiser. Thyssen urged tycoons to give millions to the Nazis, and even helped persuade President Hindenburg to appoint a young Adolf as Chancellor. For all his hard work, Fritz was made governor of Prussia, an honorary title with even less actual responsibility than Managing General Partner of the Texas Rangers. But then, Bush made over $14 million owning a chunk of the Rangers, and Thyssen ended up in Dachau. And he didn’t even trade Sammy Sosa.
Anyway, many years ago I shared a little bohemian bungalow in east Austin with several roommates, one of whom was a UT undergrad from Midland. We’ll call her Tuesday. Tuesday told me that her dad had known (well, had known of) the Bushes before their ascent to the White House. Once, under a particularly dazzling Permian basin sunset some thirty-odd years ago, a colleague of Tuesday’s father was driving down a Midland street when a young man suddenly waltzed out in front of his car. The colleague slammed on his brakes and very narrowly missed splattering the witless pedestrian all over the asphalt. Naturally, the guy turned out to be young George W.
See kids? Darting out from between parked cars is not only dangerous—it can alter the course of history.
When I told my third-hand Bush story to Miranda Brown while drinking miniature beers at an eastside wedding, she asked me if I’d ever read a short story by Roald Dahl entitled Genesis and Catastrophe. A week later I found myself at the Yarborough library, checking out Kiss Kiss, Dahl’s 1960 short story collection. As if to accentuate that it wasn’t a collection of his children’s stories, the only copy they had was in LARGE TYPE. (The same subtlety one finds in the story, no less. Ah, Dahl.)
Anyway, Genesis and Catastrophe is set in Austria during the reign of Franz Josef, and starts out as an exchange between a doctor and woman who’s just given birth to her fourth child. She’s anxious, understandably, because the other three died shortly after birth, and this one looks even smaller and sicklier than her previous ill-fated progeny. She cries and laments how much she has prayed to God to have just one child live. The doctor urges her to relax, and pleads with the cold, drunk, and judgmental father to be kind to his troubled young wife. He tells them not to worry. There’s nothing wrong with the baby, he’s perfectly fine. There’s every likelihood he will grow up to be a fine and strapping man. Then the reader discovers that the baby—wait for it—is the newborn Adolfus Hitler.
Do I wish W. had been struck and killed by that car? No, because untimely death is a tragic waste. But would I allow a young Hitler to perish shortly after birth? Sure. I don’t think it would have caused him much pain, and there could have been other, less Hegelian children. His mother may have gone mad from grief, but I don’t think she was in a position to start deporting communists and homosexuals.
Ironically, babies are far cuter and more innocent than oblivious j-walkers. They are clean little slates. I guess this is why I’m troubled by my willingness to trade a baby for 100 million lives, but not a young man to mitigate a different episode of widespread destruction, albeit by preserving a different brutal dictatorship. This is tough. I recall that F. Scott Fitzgerald once wrote, “The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.” But that’s not really helping me here. And F. Scott never met our president.
Maybe there really is some sort-of-secret NWO cabal running things, and maybe any other elected official would have pushed us into Iraq II. But also, maybe it was Germany’s time 75 years ago. A butterfly, somewhere, had spoken, and the tsunami of their will had no choice but to erupt in some shape or another. But without radical, militant, and anti-Semitic leadership, they may have used that same energy, will, and capability to do truly great things. Or at least empowered a similar head who wouldn’t have fought a two-front war. Either way, we’d all be speaking German by now, probably. But, if it hadn’t been Hitler who rode a wave of millions of reichsmarks and dollars to the Reichstag, or if the democratic process had been allowed to flourish under a conscientious and socially liberal progressivism, then maybe, instead of taking your 6th grade World History class to see the Schindler’s List matinee at the discount theatre, we’d all be flying Touregs through the stratosphere and drinking steins of Spaten on the Moon: An idea I find so attractive, it’s almost enough to wish for the death of a child.






If only he had been changing the radio station....
Great column.
I super love you. Anyone who drops "Hegelian" in a post gets my love purely based on educational snootery.
The whole column (but especially that last paragraph) reminds me of the documentary Zeitgeist, which I recently watched. It's a bit conspiracy theory for me, but still intriguing.
I'm originally from Connecticut and have to take issue on the "GWB is not a Texan" claim. If you want to see a real Northeastern Bushie politician, look at GHWB. Sure he was a jerk, but at least he had some pragmatism to him, and knew that doing things like determining foreign policy by "listening to Jesus" and invading Iraq were moronic.
GWB would had never been elected in Connecticut. The voters are too intelligent and well-educated there. He is in his position because of the bulk of rootin' tootin' undeducated Texans that were more than happy to elect a moron like him.
Your "intelligent and well-educated" state keeps electing Joe Lieberman, whose support for the invasion of Iraq remains unwavering and led many Democrats into voting in favor of authorizing military force against Iraq. Please pat yourself and your home state on the back a little harder. It's funny.
brattpowered is right. about the "brat" part at least.
"Undeducated", eh? Priceless.
Uh, I think Brattpowered is right on the mark about uneducated Texans. Worse than that, I think the moneyed powers that be in this god-forsaken state (Austin doesn't count) purposely underfund education to keep the general electorate stupid enough to keep them in power.
http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/wwstand/wws0512ed/
Cynical, but highly possible.
I'm sure there's still time enough in your life to get a teaching certificate, move to Monahans and make a difference in small town Texas, piltdownman.
Methinks Ms. Steak and Piltdown are in cahoots.
Someone educated in Texas using an unintented typo as a replacement for a valid counter-argument? Priceless.
Pilt... That makes a lot of sense to me. Keep the populace stupid, and they'll worry more about raising their trucks and sinking their paychecks into adjustable-rate mortgages on crackerjack vinyl houses than becoming involved in the political process. Now let's see if anyone actually responds to these views or cops out by picking apart posts for typographical errors...
buttpowered.
HA!
BP, you need to make an actual point before anyone can "respond" to it.
His point was that he's from Connecticut which makes him better than you because he wears a monocle and drives a porshe that is.....
butt. powered.
HA!
you are an awesome writer, benjamin! and i enjoyed the ideas you were kicking around.
just one thing: f. scott f.? a brilliant, conflicted drunk with more than a few ideas impossible to hold.
so i'm not sure lack of clarity is an indication of a weak mind -- maybe just a slightly unsound creative one.
(i cling to that hope, at least) ;)
Read post #4
The Piltdown Man was a hoax...as is the idea that the denizens of Connecticut are somehow intellectually superior to Texans.
"GWB would had never been elected in Connecticut. The voters are too intelligent and well-educated there."
Like his father, Bush attended the prestigious Philips Andover Academy in Massachusetts before matriculating at Yale University. He graduated from Yale with a bachelor’s degree in 1968...
In 1972, Bush entered Harvard Business School, earning his M.B.A. in 1975.
http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9232768
Care to impress us with your superior NE education by making any more brilliant arguments, Bratt? (BTW, I'm well aware that Andover & Cambridge aren't in CT., but it's still enough to make Bush a non-Texan.)
State rivalry (much like school spirit - screw the Longhorns) is just freakin' stupid. I do stand by my claim, however, that Texas underfunds education (that based on the facts) and the reason for that just may be a very manipulative one.
I saw #4. See #5. And #19.
Let me sum the 'point' made by BP:
"Even though Bush is from CT, a fact I will refute for no discernable purpose whatsoever before lobbing pointless incendiary comments at whole populations, at least we're not stupid and undeducated like the truck-driving, no-finance-understanding yee-haws in Texas."
That, BP, is more of a baseless, mean-spirited taunt (hence my appropriate response) rather than an actual point. Much in the same way that "your mom's dick is bigger than your mouth and that's why she's so disappointed in you, huh?" isn't really a point. It's sensational hyperbole (which I'm a big fan of). But not an actual point.
Has the jacket crest fallen that far? (that, too, is sensational hyperbole, and this is a smug explanation, dripping with sarcasm).
Here's my point, BP: you are neither smarter nor dumber than anyone you've ever looked down upon, Texan yee-haws included, and no state has the ability to prove itself smarter or dumber than another. And the fact that you can't spell the word you use to debase others' educational efforts, whether you can appreciate it or not, is priceless.
While approaching a stoplight on Congress Saturday night, this (drunken?) couple stepped out in front of our car (they were not using a crosswalk, btw, just walking between cars on the street). My friend had to slam on her brakes to avoid hitting them. They did not so much as LOOK AT US as our hearts practically stopped beating in our chests. They kept on walking, seemingly oblivious.
My points:
a) with all the news of cars hitting pedestrians/cyclists lately, EVERYONE needs to effing PAY ATTENTION. For the love of Christ.
b) Now I'm wondering if either of those people will be an oppressive dictator someday.
Maybe if people didn't drive so much they'd remember how to walk right.
Also, truecraig whooped buttpowered's ass.
Overzealous Polemics: Priceless
Huh? I grewed up in Cunneticut and donesn't no whut ur werds meen.
The frustrating thing about calling out a polemic is that it's an immediate pot-n-kettle conversation. Unless you're outing a "strawman" polemic.
Oppressive dictator?
You mean like that sociopathic brute that spoke at Columbia yesterday?
True, don't you have anything better to do?
Shimon Peres was at Columbia?
Nah.
You?