Strike Three, You're Out - And You're Welcome, Buddy

umpire.jpg

Researchers at the University of Texas have found that umpires are more likely to call strikes for pitchers of the same race or ethnicity, according to an article at LiveScience.

The study analyzed every pitch from the 2004 through 2006 major league baseball seasons in an effort to determine whether racial discrimination figured into an umpire's decision to call a strike or a ball.

“Umpires judge the performance of players every game, deciding whether pitches are strikes or balls,” UT economics professor Daniel Hamermesh told LiveScience. “Discrimination affects the outcome of a game and the labor market, determining the pitcher’s market value and compensation.”

The research found that if a pitcher was of the same race or ethnicity as the home plate umpire, more strikes are called and his team’s chance of winning is improved.

The power to evaluate players’ performances disproportionately belonged chiefly to white umpires, while negative calls particularly impacted minority pitchers, Hamermesh said.

But, this behavior diminishes when the umpire's calls are more closely scrutinized—for example, at ballparks with electronic monitoring systems, in full count situation where there are 3 balls or 2 strikes, or at well-attended games.

Hamermesh conducted the study with UT grad student Johan Sulaeman, along with finance professors from McGill and Auburn universities.

Photo by Geren W. Mortensen, Jr. on flickr

Email This Entry


Comments (3) [rss]

Isn't there some pesky research rule about causation and correlation? Wish I could remember what it was.

Sheesh, what a huge waste of time.

Besides, what exactly did the study find? Nothing, really...

"White pitchers were granted a strike on 32.06 percent of the called pitches that white umpires viewed, as opposed to 31.47 percent for Hispanic pitchers and 30.61 percent for African American pitchers."

http://www.statesman.com/sports/content/sports/stories/other/08/14/0814umpires.html

32.06% vs. 31.47% vs. 30.61%.

Wow.

What a huge, huge waste of time and dollars.

Ha! I didn't even read the results before I posted. These researchers apparently never learned about margin of error, either.

Wankers.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Austinist

Austinist is a news and culture website about Austin, Texas. We publish Monday through Friday, and also maintain a guide to local arts and entertainment events that we call the Weekly IST List.

Editor: Allen Y Chen
Publisher: Gothamist

Recent Comments

Dig It

Contribute

Latest Tip:

where's the public outcry over the condition of waterloo park?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Austinist.

All Our RSS