Austinist: Hill Country Residents Outraged by LCRA Plan to Make Them Pay For Cost of Providing Water Service

guest

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:24:31 -0600

I'm glad they are finally paying the true costs to supply them water in the middle of nowhere. It's not fair to have others subsidize their lifestyle.

guest

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:54:31 -0600

Why would anyone be watering their grass when it's rained 75 inches last month?

guest

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:07:45 -0600

I live next door to LCRA. Is my water free?

kenneth1

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:49:55 -0600

I'm gazing into the abyss, but all I'm seeing is a 6-BR split-level mansion, with swimming pool & cabana in back.

shilli

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:36:35 -0600

Also, I like to think of my posts not as satire, but more as something similar to the work of Mark Rothko - open to a wide variety of interpretations, often revealing more about the viewer than they do about the artist. When you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

shilli

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:23:57 -0600

I believe the schedule provided at the bottom of the Statesman article is the full graduated structure: Gallons - Current - 2008 (proposed) 5,000 - $38.70 - $54.40 10,000 - $52.70 - $77.15 25,000 - $105.20 - $173.15 50,000 - $248.95 - $406.90 75,000 - $411.45 - $701.90 100,000 - $573.95 - $996.90 The fact that the scale goes up to 100,000 (per month!) is a little mind boggling. If you run the numbers, it isn't actually progressive - users of 25,000 gallons per month are charged less per gallon than users of 5,000 gallons per month. In Austin, residential single-family customers are charged on a graduated scale per 1,000 gallons of $0.88 for the first 2,000 Gallons, $2.30 for the next 7,000, $3.88 for the next 6,000 and $6.91 after that. That type of strucure, where the first 2,000 gallons is very low cost and rates rise quickly after that makes more sense to me. I'd rather see the increase be much sharper, such that a single family residential home (in Austin or the Hill Country) using more than a few thousand gallons a month would be charged very dearly.

kenneth1

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:02:46 -0600

The above statement seems a bit misdirected. Wilceaux, I'm pretty sure Shilli was being sarcastic with the "Le duh" comment. The point of the post is that it was LCRA who made all that surburban sprawl possible in the Hill Country by extending water service to every Tom, Dick and Harry developer with a plat. Now they're shrieking that all those rich folks are dumping too much precious fluid on their lush lawns. Physician heal thyself.

Scooby

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:01:32 -0600

Does LCRA have a graduated rate structure that charges less for the first X thousand gallons? The info from the Spaceman only compares one monthly usage (10,000 gallons) which is a few times the amount that a family needs for drinking & sanitary purposes. At the low densities proposes, they should be grateful that they are getting service at all. Maybe the whiners should check on the cost of installation, operation & maintenance of a reliable (i.e., deep) well before complaining about the cost of clean water delivered right to the house.

guest

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:43:48 -0600

I agree with wilceaux. If you're going to live in a desert and still want ridiculous amounts of temperate vegetation on your property, you can pay the premium for it.

wilceaux

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:23:37 -0600

"Le duh! All that St. Augustine isn't going to irrigate itself. Joe must have forgotten that the Hill Country is basically a desert and without all that water, the grass turns brown." The above statement seems a bit misdirected. I would say it is the residents who are complaining that have forgotten they live in an arid environment. I also find it ironic that the Statesman article quoted a man that moved last year from Arizona. I wonder what his water bill was over there.