Austinist: Foodie Rodents, Weepy Whites, City of Lights!: New Movie Releases

guest

Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:23:46 -0600

These reviews tell me what I need to know. Thanks.

guest

Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:38:41 -0600

I reiterate myself. Needs, no matter how heartbreakingly tragic, should not create rights. Furthermore rights should never place duties or burdens on any other person/party. Look, the U.S. has a social healthcare net called Medicare/Medicaid. It doesn't promise to be the best, but it does promise to benefit all that qualify. If you have the money you should be able to buy better and more advanced healthcare, that's how it works with schooling in the U.S. Everyone gets a basic minimum (public school K-12) but if you want you can buy a better education (private schooling). No one seems to bitch about that. I agree the U.S. should alter its healthcare policy, but instead of trying to keep 60+'s alive for 3 or 4 more years we should be focusing on prevention.

guest

Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:57:27 -0600

Wants should never create rights but universal needs should. Like "I want a wii" as opposed to "I need clean drinking water." Everyone should have a right to clean drinking water in this country, no matter how expensive it is to distribute but nobody is going to die if they don't have a wii. Didn't you learn this as a child? Maybe that's what's wrong with this country. Too many teachers teaching to tests which leaves children with no common sense or the ability to think for themselves.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:42:46 -0600

People's needs and wants do not create rights. No matter how serious or personal they are.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:15:50 -0600

Also, I have no idea what DMV you've been going to but the one on North Lamar had a wait time of about oh.... 5 minutes... the three times I've been there. And if you need your mail to get somewhere faster, mail it sooner, stupid.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:13:42 -0600

"After my recent visit to Canada, I'll stick with the U.S. healthcare system. They are jealous of ours, and anyone there with money come here for medical care (since it takes so damn long to see a doctor there)." That's funny. I spoke with a man from Montreal this weekend who grew up in Canada and now lives in the US. His mother is dying of cancer and he says he thanks God every day that his mom lives in Canada since they'd never be able to afford the constant nursing care and emergancy hospital visits and appointments and treatments she needs. He says that if you stub your toe or have a cold, it takes forever to see a doctor in Canada since those things aren't emergancys, but if you have the flu or break your leg or need emergancy care, you get it. It's called prioritizing by illness not by the insurance a patient has.

guest

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:08:43 -0600

What is your perspective in the healthcare field? Whatever your role maybe, it should make you sensitive to the fact that there are thousands of Americans who can't get the health care they need. Danimal's right, look our "best mean/median care" and then you realize it's incapacitated by HMOs. Ratatouille was awesome.

guest

Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:21:53 -0600

After my recent visit to Canada, I'll stick with the U.S. healthcare system. They are jealous of ours, and anyone there with money come here for medical care (since it takes so damn long to see a doctor there). Also, "universal healthcare" does exist in the U.S. -- it's called the Emergency Room. I've been in the healthcare field for 10 years and have seen the ER abused by thousands. Finally, the government can't seem to get my mail where it needs to go in a timely fashion, and they make me wait in lines for hours at the DMV -- why should anyone expect them to do a better job with healthcare than the free market?

danimal

Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:21:18 -0600

That depends on how you define "best" health care. If you mean "best care if money is no object", then sure, US is tops. If you mean "best mean/median care" or "most complete coverage", then you'll get a much different answer. Undoubtedly everyone has a different answer to that question (and there's probably a strong correlation between their answer and political affiliation, but that's a separate issue).

guest

Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:30:48 -0600

If a large majority of people knew what kind of coverage they would receive with a universal health care system then they would prefer the current system we have in America. The fact of the matter is that the U.S. actually has the best health care in the world, if you can afford it, why do you think the best medical doctors around the world flock to the U.S., or the fact that most of the world's drugs are created from for-profit American pharma companies? It becomes cheaper for everyone once it is paid down overtime by the wealthy. I'm sure Moore will not press these issues, amongst many others, but I don't expect him to. I will see the movie and I'm sure it will also address credible concerns, I'm only fearful that it will insight knee-jerk support for a universal health care system.

Sudo

Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:40 -0600

Thanks Molly - this post made me laugh like 4 times. And as a bonus, I'll be dreaming tonight of Long, Willis, leather and a rather stern penis.