<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Should Austin Welcome New Wal-Marts? Dionysium to Resolve the Debate</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php</link>
<description>All comments for Should Austin Welcome New Wal-Marts? Dionysium to Resolve the Debate</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Adam S</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:41:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>aschragin@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>aschragin@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>M1EK</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004559</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004559</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:39:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Many people would go to THIS Wal-Mart on the bus, especially workers, because unlike Wal-Marts on frontage roads, it can be (and is currently) served by a number of good-quality bus routes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stew</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004494</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004494</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:23:09 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;M1EK,
 
  I disagree with you on many of your points. But let&apos;s forget those right now. All I want to know is why you would like less parking?

  Most people that go to Wal-Mart don&apos;t ride the bus, never will ride the bus, don&apos;t want to be in a bus. Solving traffic problems by building less parking is idiotic. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>M1EK</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004353</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004353</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:56:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m OK with asking Wal-Mart and Lincoln nicely to build something less shitty. I&apos;m definitely OK with making sure they pay for any drastic externalities they generate. I&apos;m even OK with making them build closer to the street / with less parking. But I&apos;m against forcing them to do so - unless Wal-Mart and Lincoln get to vote on what color the people in the surrounding neighborhoods paint _their_ houses and stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Stew</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004326</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2007/02/05/should_austin_welcome_new_walmarts_dionysium_to_resolve_the_debate.php#comment-1004326</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:14:10 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Keep Austin Weird By Allowing Wal-Mart

Otherwise there will be more justification for dictating what is permissible to build on your property.

  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>