<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Austinist Preview: SuicideGirls at Emo&apos;s</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php</link>
<description>All comments for Austinist Preview: SuicideGirls at Emo&apos;s</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Adam S</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:41:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>aschragin@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>aschragin@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Jessie</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php#comment-611548</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php#comment-611548</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 13:06:03 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What a great show!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jarrod</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php#comment-603989</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php#comment-603989</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 12:26:21 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Like I said, more than a little controversy. Bust Magazine did a highly critical expose on it a few months ago.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Buttery Nipples</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php#comment-603817</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/03/austinist_preview_suicidegirls_at_emos.php#comment-603817</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 12:05:12 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad, if you look past the &quot;we’re 100% women owned and operated&quot; PR machine, you’ll find that two dudes co-own Suicide Girls LLC. And what’s up with the models only getting a flat fee of $300 for their photos, which SG owns 100% of? So much for empowerment I guess. 

Chuck
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
