<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Whole Foods Now Selling Wind</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php</link>
<description>All comments for Whole Foods Now Selling Wind</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Adam S</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 12:41:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>aschragin@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>aschragin@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>cbot</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-602643</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-602643</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:46:06 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Big picture comment:  There are many, many problems with wind energy.  First of all, wind generation necessitates huge transmission lines coming from West Texas (where the energy is made).  And the Texas legislature&apos;s decision to allow all renewable energy credits to come from wind (which is already sort of reasonable cost-wise) means that other types of renewables that are more promising in the long run -- like solar energy -- are not being pursued.

Small Picture Comment:  Those cards are stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Bill</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-602429</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-602429</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:01:25 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;sean, that was hilarious ! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>sean</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-597568</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-597568</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:32:57 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Obviously they&apos;re running out of air to fill up the extra space inside those Kettle Chips Krinkle Cut Salt and Pepper potato chip bags.  

Don&apos;t buy these cards. They should fill up those bags with MORE CHIPS, not more wind.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kevin</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-597020</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-597020</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:43:40 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;you&apos;ve all seen the History of Whole Foods &apos;timeline&apos; that wraps all around their little eating area by the north entrance, right? every single &apos;plot point&apos; begins with &apos;WF acquired...&apos;, &apos;WF bought...&apos;, &apos;WF merged with...&apos;

if walmart is an authoritarian enterprise, then whole foods is a totalitarian one.

but their linzer cookies are sooooo good... &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>josh</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-596732</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-596732</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:05:05 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;One proven way of increasing our usage of renewable energy is via demand.  I support companies like Whole Foods that buy wind energy; more demand for wind energy + profits for wind energy suppliers = more wind energy suppliers and a shift towards a greater wind energy component in our energy mix.

But I don&apos;t know what these cards do.  It sounds to me like you&apos;re buying electricity that is delivered to someone else.  This is not, as they say in economics, a sustainable model.  Ask your employer or retailer or electric provider to purchase more wind energy, and there might actually be sustainable gains.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>josh</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-596543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-596543</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:36:52 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;look, i&apos;m all for green hippy bullshit, but this is ridiculous.  it&apos;s like a vagrant asking for money, promising that he&apos;ll stay vegetarian.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>M1EK</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-596487</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/11/02/whole_foods_now_selling_wind.php#comment-596487</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:27:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Like all other &apos;voluntary&apos; emissions offsets, it&apos;s RE TAR DED. It just allows others to pollute more in your stead for less money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>