If you miss the old Woody Allen, the incredibly witty one with highly-developed (neurotic) characters experiencing genuine personal conflict supported by crisp dialogue, we suggest you hit up the mini Woody retrospective at the Paramount Theatre this weekend, featuring Annie Hall and Hannah and Her Sisters. If you want to see the aging, trite Woody Allen and his desperate attempts at comedy with his most recent muse, Scarlett Johannson, then you may want to check out his latest release, Scoop.
After more or less hitting his mark with a bit of a throwback serious dramatic piece in Match Point, Allen returns to the scene of the crime, London, to shoot this silly romp, a move he admits was basically a bit of opportunism at the chance to write something for the lovely Johannson. With a nod to the mystical whimsy of The Purple Rose of Cairo, Allen relies on fantastical elements in this comedic whodunit that is more about the interplay of the comedic characters than any serious Holmesian sleuthing.
American journalism student Sondra Pransky (Johannson) attends a magic act of the bumbling Spledini aka Sid Waterman (Allen) and ends up meeting the ghost of a recently-deceased journalist. The spirit gives her a tip on what could be the hottest crime story in recent British history. Pransky, with Splendini filling the role of sidekick, sets out to play girl detective, following her investigation into the heart of upper-crust London society. Her investigation of the aristocratic Peter Lyman, played to perfection by the dashing Hugh Jackman, leads the awkward American (and watching Johannson play awkward has become a bit trying) into a full-blown affair with her subject. Balancing her lust for Lyman and her exasperation with Splendini, she struggles to stay true to her journalistic intentions, in hopes of uncovering the truth without losing a chance at love.
Unlike many of his artistic contemporaries who have recently dealt with aging and the loss of sexual vigor in their works, see: Phillip Roth, Allen does not angrily fight his plank-walk towards death with bouts of misanthropy and resentment of emasculation. Indeed, what initially seems like a story that will have Allen fawning over a sexy young thing becomes a pleasant, if not meaningless romp with Waterman playing the father figure role. Thankfully. The last thing audiences want to see at this point is Allen trying to delude himself and us into believing that any character he inhabits could have a shot with an ingénue such as Johannson.
Scoop allows Allen to use his awkwardness to pure comedic effect instead of sexual charm, as he plays the curmudgeon who provides slapstick relief to the real meat of the story. However, one would be hard pressed to find any substance in this silly film. And watching Johannson struggle, at times intentionally and at other times unknowingly, with the idea of being a confused youth who is not a yet a woman, frustrates the audience which longs for a time in the near future when the starlet gains control of her unbridled sexuality and charisma and can begin to take on roles of more substance and maturity.
While Allen’s clever writing does have its high points, the audience feels cheated with the fact that a master of high comedy and intriguing drama does neither well here. The sun seems to have set on Allen’s virtuosity, but it almost appears as if Allen knows it and has decided to modestly defer to his actors while resigning to the fact that his best days are behind him. Now it appears he solely intends to have a little fun with the thing. Unfortunately, Scoop does not quite provide the intended fun.
If you want to see Woody at his best, check out Annie Hall or Hannah and Her Sisters.
Scoop opens today.
Annie Hall
Paramount Theatre
Saturday @ 7pm
Sunday @ 2pm
Hannah and Her Sisters
Paramount Theatre
Saturday @ 9:10pm
Sunday @ 4:10pm

Pecan Street Project Gets $10.4 Million Stimulus Grant


So would you say this is for the "Bananas" fans and "Hall" Haters? Or is more of his new breed of movies like "Match Point"
bananas was kina a young woody just having fun, being silly and finding his legs. maybe the first two can be said baout htis, but it is defintely meant to have more of a story than bananas. the characters here do not make you feel anything about them or really believe them. it is just kinda hackneyed, neither here nor there
Austin definitely loves us some Diane Keaton -- heck, we named a major street after her . . .
Ah yes, we all like his earlier funny films.
Damn, what a great review! Don't know how I missed this when it was initially posted. I'm a huge Allen fan, and I've been wondering about this one. More'n likely I'll still see it -- silly & pointless can sometimes be a nice break -- and at least now I know what to expect.