<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Funding for the Arts in Texas Threatened!</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/03/31/funding_for_the_arts_in_texas_threatened.php</link>
<description>All comments for Funding for the Arts in Texas Threatened!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 austin_allen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:56:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>allen@escapeest.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>allen@escapeest.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>hb</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2006/03/31/funding_for_the_arts_in_texas_threatened.php#comment-226126</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2006/03/31/funding_for_the_arts_in_texas_threatened.php#comment-226126</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:11:43 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hey, there is an option beyond the live-or-die scenario described above, that most often happens with Sunset reviews: the agency continues, but with its scope, powers and function &quot;revamped&quot; by the legislature.  The Sunset Commission report mentioned in your article has other recommendations for the Arts Commission that will form a basis of debate in the legislature, even after the Wolfster is marginalized by the great barage of Austinist-inspired save-the-arts mail.  You can find the report about the Commission on the Arts from a drop-down menu at http://www.sunset.state.tx.us/.  Remember, getting the legislature to continue the Commission is only the first hurdle - the second is whether it will continue with the authority and funding that allows it to feed our starving artists, who in turn feed our collective souls! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>