Quantcast

"The Building of Cities Is One of Man's Greatest Achievements"

owana.jpg

Growing up within the confines of our suburban cul-de-sac - perched imperially at the top of a hill, no less - we can say with little hesitation that in the master-planned communities dotting the outskirts of every major city, it's terribly difficult to have any meaningful collective social development. Now, planning committes in Austin are determined to do away with what in the last few decades has become the de-facto community-buildling scheme, and "create better subdivisions with shorter blocks and smaller, well-linked streets." And, while most of us actually consider "suburbia" and "evil" to be somewhat synonymous, the Statesman's Sarah Coppola reports that this is probably in large part because of the way they're put together:

To hear land planners tell it, the modern subdivision is a demon of sorts, an evil force sucking the health, joy and friendliness right out of suburbia.

Subdivision cul-de-sacs, the theory goes, isolate neighbors and are tough for ambulances and garbage trucks to navigate. Dead ends and security gates enhance loneliness and clog nearby roads with traffic. And long, curvy streets force residents to drive cars instead of walk.

The alternative, the so-called "New Urbanism," is a return to the neighborhoods of yore: when people actually walked places, engaged in idle chit-chat, and generally fostered a genuine sense of community interaction. Rose-hued ruminations notwithstanding, NewUrbanism.com describes the concept as such:

NEW URBANISM promotes the creation and restoration of diverse, walkable, compact, vibrant, mixed-use communities composed of the same components as conventional development, but assembled in a more integrated fashion, in the form of complete communities. These contain housing, work places, shops, entertainment, schools, parks, and civic facilities essential to the daily lives of the residents, all within easy walking distance of each other.

Which sounds both lovely and exciting, and thus unrealistic to implement. As part of the Envision Central Texas framework, which calls for "smarter, denser development" and some semblance of an efficient mass transit system, members of the Austin Planning Commission are concocting such a proposal to present to the City Council later this year. Naturally, this isn't the first time that Austin's tried to improve its subdivision planning: various proposals have been placed on the table since 1998, but in every instance the developers, urban planners and city staff members failed to reach a consensus.

Might this new effort be the one that finally sticks?

* quote by Edmund Bacon

Contact the author of this article or email tips@austinist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Dave Sullivan has the patience of a saint and is absolutely right on this stuff. Anybody who rides a bike in the center-city knows you're so much better off in places where there's a real street grid - like in Clarksville or Hyde Park, than you are in the cul-de-sac infested suburbs, where you have no choice but to ride on huge roads.

    It's in the city's financial interest to enforce this stuff, but until recently the political will did not exist to force it on developers - it may exist now, but it's arguably too late given the relatively small amount of undeveloped land which would be subject to these rules.

blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@austinist.com