Quantcast

Boards of Canada's Campfire Headphase: Not For the Bored

BofCadjusted.jpg

All in all, we found Board of Canada’s The Campfire Headphase to be pleasant, easy listening. But if you have severe ADD, or any other nervous disorder which precludes you from sitting still or being patient with falling leaves, you might consider something else with a bit more kick.

Ask yourself something, and be as honest as you can swing it: do you enjoy kicking back with a cup of smooth coffee, pint of Fireman’s 4, tray of homegrown, or glass of smooth Australian shiraz whilst reading Richard Wright and listening to understated beats, rhythms, and melodies? You don’t? You’re far too cool for that? Nice.

Well get the hell off this post then, because none of the following will make any sense to you.

Everyone else: let’s discuss, briefly, the Scottish duo, Mike Sandison and Marcus Eion Sandison (yes, they are apparently brothers) as Boards of Canada. Okay then.

For those who catch “the feelings” (those who “hear” emotions, or “see” audio representations), that’s all that must be said. BofC are considered by many to be musical Gods in this context. Their previous releases gained them a sizeable underground following. But their newest release: Campfire Headphase (popped out the Warp womb in October 2005), takes a slight turn, and deserves a bit of expounding upon.

Back in the day, we used to use BoC’s work as filler on various DJ mix CDs. It serves well for good mood-transition, as the songs are typically instrumental (aside from some sampling) and THICK with emotion (yes, we consider “hopelessly lazy” to be a valid emotion). Their pieces were always catchy and melodic, with intricate beats behind lots of sweeping harmonies. Great movement, considering how soupy they crafted their tracks to be. Most of it felt dark, if not morose, but it always kept our attention through those swift movements.

However, to the casual listener (or even a seasoned fan), this newest release will more than likely send the message that Boards of Canada wants to put you to sleep. Elevator music. Theme music for sci-fi dream sequences. Or perhaps the sort of neo-hippy, patchouli-mob-ish tunes one would expect to doze off to during an aromatherapy massage session (complete with crystal rub? Word). Maybe that would be a reasonable assertion. But nothing could possibly be that simple. Could it?

A bit of a departure from their fan/critic-labeled “electronica” efforts such as Geogaddi or Music Has the Right to Children, Campfire is much more laid back. Describing their “style” for the sake of labeling convenience seems pretty impossible to us. We don’t hold BofC’s feet to the electronica fire for a number of reasons, but mainly because their "style" has always felt like an overwhelmingly classical journey with electronics being the most convenient vehicle to travel in. Even more confounding: they’ve been getting this odd “psychedelica” stamp by reviewers and critics recently. We have no idea what the hell that means. But it sounds like snobbish, musical esoterrorism at work to us.

Stranger still: other critics are highlighting the use of guitars in Campfire. Seriously? Musicians? With guitars? No way… that’s just… so crazy…

GET THE FUCK OUT!

Not to downplay the introduction of new instruments for this Scots duo, but their use of guitar is hardly notable, let alone stellar. For the most part, any guitar work is used as loop-material. If not used for loops, it simply pokes in and out of tracks the same way they previously used synth instrumentation or their reproductions of 70’s educational film pieces*. There’s no reason to use phrases like “break-through” or “turning point” when referring to their use of the guitar. That is hardly the case. And by carving out their use of real strings for the first (recorded) time, the listener runs the risk of losing the potential point of the arrangement as a whole.

And as for the arrangement as a whole…

To our ears, no single track breaks completely free from the others, as they all appear to be designed to be listened to in tandem. A sort of dreamy, lazy waltz through a set of numbed emotions, all clasped hand-in-hand. Which makes the entire album great for background music. The term “background” is quite important here. If we were to strap on headphones and plow through this entire album, focusing on its movements the same way we would any version of Holtz’s Planets, we would probably end up irritated with notions of unnecessary repetition and spotty intra-song transitions. It would be the aural equivalent of being underwater while watching two hazy submarines in the distance, slowly grind into a minor collision, in slow motion.

But those feelings are more than likely planned by the Brothers Sandison. As stated earlier, the album appears to be a representation of emotional progression. Not all emotions are pleasant, and they rarely exchange places smoothly (even the more innocuous ones). Concepts such as these are difficult to express with music, but we venture that they are even more difficult to decipher from music. Especially instrumental music.

If that description was far too vague for you (it would be for us), then perhaps a more discreet approach would be more appropriate.

Here’s the track listing with some terse notes for each:

1. Into the Rainbow Vein – too brief to go anywhere substantial, but tasteful. Emotion: shoulder-shrugging confusion.
2. Chromakey Dreamcoat - bent guitar sample, looped in catchy way. Emotion:contemplative elation (like, when you cheat and get away with it, but feel bad)
3. Satellite Anthem Icarus - slow mover. Floats on by (ocean sounds and all). Emotion:depressing disappointment.
4. Peacock Tail - ever heard anything off Moodfood by Mood Swings? Yep. Emotion:couldn’t get a good read on this one, actually.
5. Dayvan Cowboy - wispy, gets Bruckheimer soundtrackish at the 2:00 mark. Emotion: happiness at news of your never-met step-uncle’s not having colon cancer.
6. A Moment of Clarity – another brief track. Barely audible. Emotion: Sleepy time.
7. ’84 Pontiac Dream - a solid nod to 70’s porn, with cartoon effects mixed in. Emotion: subtle excitement at watching sibling(s) be punished.
8. Sherbet Head – almost three minutes of four repeated notes, with the recording of a cinder block being dragged across gravel. Emotion: after-argument calm, with echoes of rage.
9. Oscar See Through Red Eye – light rhythm, electro-claps, synthed-up strings. Emotion: the building of pride.
10. Ataronchronon – could easily be a “eureka moment” sound bite for Star Trek. Emotion: “No shit? Word!”
11. Hey Saturday Sun – a friendly set of interweaving loops with a very, very lazy beat. Emotion: drunken elation.
12. Constants Are Changing – very tight build-up in the intro, but then it decides to go nowhere but where it feels like going. Emotion: indifference, like that felt after a workmate who tried to get you fired emails the entire company asking who stole their can of soda from the communal fridge. Whatever man.
13. Slow This Bird Down – DJ Screw kills an electro-single for the first part, and then all drops off for a heavily-produced guitar loop. Emotion: what you feel when thinking about how your dog will one day be dead.
14. Tears From the Compound Eye – very reminiscent to some of their earlier stuff. Very bare, ambient intro which then fades into nothing, which ends up being the entirety of the song. Emotion: dejected confusion caused by, let’s say, at the age of fifty, learning that you are, in fact, adopted.
15. Farewell Fire – even more subtle and drawn out than the previous track. Of its eight or so minutes, this song is trying to end for seven of them. Emotion: The feeling one gets when smelling the scent of rain as if evaporates from hot pavement.

Again, contrary to some of our takes on individual tracks, we enjoyed this album (in so far as it fits the concept we felt it was supposed to represent), but we were somewhat prepared for the nature of Board of Canada’s style. As always, we suggest sampling on the interweb before plunging into anything (hello there, obnoxious caveat statement!).

*Thank you Shannon! BofC would probably thank you as well!

Image from Warp Records, BofC's label

Contact the author of this article or email tips@austinist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Wow, Shannon, that is a very tight review of the album, and a very succinct review of my discussion around the album (meta-reviews are the new blog). Very, very well done.



    I did not mean to say that I thought the album sounded like “elevator music”. I was trying to point out that a pedestrian take on the album would more than likely reflect that conclusion (and that it deserves a second listen, if that is indeed the conclusion one comes to, because it isn’t necessarily fair to BofC). But you are 100% correct about the 70’s educational films thing. They are indeed known for reproduction, and other than some vocals here and there, they only sample their own original work. That was very poor wording on my part, and shall be corrected in the copy. BofC deserves better wording than that which I used.



    I would like to point out that I am never, ever going to write with the hardened and deeply studied music enthusiast in mind. Anyone who is already a fan/loathes a band like BofC (or anything else I write about for that matter: book, movie, music, haircut) is probably going to get very little from reading me. I try to write with the non-listening individual in mind. To those who are in the process of refining their taste. In this case, someone who currently listens to “whatever is on the radio”, but has started considering more specific styles. My intention is to make something as wonderful as music: more accessible. Fewer barriers to entry. Less daunting (than perhaps it is, but that’s another discussion altogether).



    If the discussion of this particular album were a bicycle ride, your depth and name-dropping would be the equivalent of an uphill mountain-biking trek through deep wilderness with Camelbacks and first aid kits. Professional grade.



    I try to offer training wheels. Everyone has to start somewhere.



    Thanks for your thoughtful commentary!

  • It's interesting that you've chosen to review an album months after its release. Kudos for that, because often the reviews that come hot on the heels of releases are rushed. But I feel like the content of your review really negates Boards of Canada's admitted nostalgia factory. I've really resisted the new record, just like I resisted Geogaddi because neither are Music Has the Right to Children, Hi-Scores, or Twoism, all of which are arguably the best of Boards of Canada's work. There are a host of nods to the past that Boards of Canada have always made that are just as apparent in the new record as in their first releases on Skam and Warp. Even though The Campfire Headphase is the first Boards of Candada record to use real guitar, guitar tones have been used for loops and textures since the first years the known Boards of Canada sound was developed, which is a sharp departure from their really early work that's in the tradition of Warp's Artificial Intelligence series--mostly post acid house / hardcore techno listening music filled with beats, bloops, & blips.



    Boards of Canada didn't sample loops from 70's educational films. They made new music in homage to that genre (for lack of a better terminology), calling on the 70s and early 80s experimental artists who made those documentary soundtracks, and ushering in quite a bit of new interests in artists who were previously unknown because their work was confined to Friday afternoon film-reels or out-dated episodes of NOVA or Nature. The "emotional progression" that you're hearing seems to be a stylistic progression, and the changes in Boards of Canada's sound mirrors the change in the sound of documentary music between the spacey Moog and Farfisa sounds of the 70s into more familiar instrumentation. The Campfire Headphase isn't quite so emotionally wrenching in that it doesn't speak so loudly of longing for simpler childhood and all that it entailed. Rather it's a record designed more to be entertaining, and it's still listening music, as Boards of Canada have been since Twoism, but calling it "elevator music" without a nod to experimental elevator music context (like Eno's Music for Airports or Music for Films or something like Schutze's Rapture of Metals) dumbs it down a little further than is necessary for anyone bothering to read a Boards of Canada review.



    Music Has the Right to Children is probably one of the most important records in the last twenty years, because it was the bellwether for change in the sound of popular music. That record, Boards of Canada's EPs leading up to it, Autechre's sound around the time of Amber, Aphex Twin (pre-"Windowlicker") and the other releases coming from Warp and Rephlex MADE the sound that everyone knows and loves from Radiohead, who have largely been credited for leading the world away from Blur and Oasis and into more emotional territory, but that's really a separate discussion.

  • Your precious Toure is safe for now. For now.

  • I read this review back in november:

    http://www.coolhunting.com/archives/2005/11/boards_of_canad_1.php



    and downloaded it off bittorrent to check it out. I think it's decent work-music. Like wallpaper for your ears. Creates a sense of rhythm to whatever you're doing without taking control of your attention the way an actual album would.



    And you better not review Ali Farka Toure's "Niafunke" next. I just got it yesterday.





blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@austinist.com