<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Liz Phair still rocks</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php</link>
<description>All comments for Liz Phair still rocks</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 austin_allen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:56:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>allen@escapeest.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>allen@escapeest.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Chris</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223458</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223458</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:02:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Liz is playing at Freddie&apos;s on S. First right now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>odam</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223451</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223451</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:09:55 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;hey, icky, you are way lame.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>IckyIckyIcky</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223450</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223450</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:53:18 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;blah. blah. blah.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Hipper than thou.</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223448</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223448</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:53:18 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Liz Phair doesn&apos;t deserve anyone&apos;s money after the pathetic performance during the World Series Game 1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>odam</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223445</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223445</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:17:22 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;mm....kelly clarkson&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>a</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223443</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223443</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:27:54 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Gina - I agree with you about whitechocolatespaceegg being her best album.  And I also agree that turning pop doesn&apos;t necessarily correspond to losing one&apos;s integrity. In Liz Phair&apos;s case, however, I think it does since her pop stuff isn&apos;t particularly original or complicated and just sounds like junk to me.  As for Kelly Clarkson - she falls under the category of music that I  know sucks critically, but is catchy enough that I&apos;ll admit to liking it when I hear it.  Some of it, anyway.  That said, I&apos;d never buy it.  I don&apos;t think it has any staying power at all.  Nor does Liz Phair&apos;s new stuff.  Sigh.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Gina</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223442</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223442</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:23:38 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I am a pre-K. Clarkson era Phair fan, but I can&apos;t say I&apos;m put off by her new stuff--it&apos;s just not special like the stuff she used to make.  And although Exile in Guyville is amazing--I think that her &quot;coolest&quot; album is &quot;WhiteChocolateSpaceEgg&quot;, but no one ever mentions this one!  Anyone agree with me?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Justin Cox</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223441</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223441</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:07:41 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;1) Turning pop doesn&apos;t have to mean you&apos;re losing your music integrity. It could just signal a change in attitude or happier time in a musician&apos;s life. 

2) I&apos;ve said it before and I&apos;ll say it again. Kelly Clarkson is the new Justin Timberlake. It is very ok to like her and not lose your music-credibility. You want to hate it, but you can&apos;t. Don&apos;t lie. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>a</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223440</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/10/31/liz_phair_still_rocks.php#comment-223440</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:39:24 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry Elizabeth, but I think she has turned into a pop queen with little more integrity than Kelly Clarkson and the like.  She used to be great, but I&apos;m not sure what happened.  I&apos;ll pass on the show, but have fun.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>