<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Austinist: Toot, toot, beep, beep</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/05/12/toot_toot_beep_beep.php</link>
<description>All comments for Toot, toot, beep, beep</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 austin_allen</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:56:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>allen@escapeest.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>allen@escapeest.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>M1EK</title>
<link>http://austinist.com/2005/05/12/toot_toot_beep_beep.php#comment-220728</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://austinist.com/2005/05/12/toot_toot_beep_beep.php#comment-220728</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 08:04:16 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The road warriors are just plain wrong - highway construction in the 1980s and 1990s DID exceed population growth around here; the problem is that new development was of types which increased the amount people drove by such a huge amount that NO feasible amount of construction could keep up.

IE: this proves not that we needed more roads, but that we needed less sprawl and more infill.

Jeb Boyt crunched the numbers quite well at his site: http://monkeymuse.blogspot.com/2005/05/urban-mobility-and-big-lie-texas.html

and I covered it at mine: http://mdahmus.thebaba.com/blog/archives/000149.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
