Democracy Inaction
Election results are in and Austin has let its true voice be heard. The overwhelming response to the polarizing and contentious debate over the smoking ban, three city council seats, education funding, and municipal elections was a resounding,
"Meh, who cares?"
According to the unofficial results released by Travis County, a whopping 14.29 percent of the electorate felt the urge to exercise their civic rights and participate in our little experiment called democracy. Just over 70k of the nearly 500k registered voters either cast their ballot early or went to the polls on election day. This is just sad.
What did the select 14% of us decide for the rest of you?
ACC Proposition: Passed with almost 80% of the vote.
Smoking ban: Passed with 51.83% of the vote
City Council:
Seat 1: Lee Leffingwell won with over 62%
Seat 4: Betty Dunkerly won with 63.5%
Seat 3: There will be a runoff between Margot Clarke and Jennifer Kim
Clarke garnered 40% of the vote and Kim got 27%
Early voting for the runoff will be May 25-June 7.
*Municipal results and precinct by precinct numbers can be found here.
For those of you who love numbers: If 1% of the electorate who disagreed with the smoking ban and didn't vote had gotten off their asses and hit the polls, the smoking ban would have failed. Not only would it have failed, but it would have failed by a larger margin of votes than it has just passed by.
Oddly enough, this isn't at all contradictory to the structure the oft lauded Founding Fathers put in place so long ago. The will of the few dictating the fate of the many. In this case though, it was not due to some outmoded indirect electoral system, but entirely caused by the apathy and indifference of the masses. In this climate, those who choose to participate exert disproportionate power over those who don't.
Which group are you in?
Comments [rss]
-
nickk
-
Z
-
nickk
-
Ayn
-
Craig
-
em
-
Z
-
GR
-
Craig
-
justin cox
-
sean stonecutter
-
Michael Barnett
-
Tom
-
Ruben
-
Michael Barnett


