What’s Next? A Urine Sample?

The Texas House voted 83-63 yesterday to approve a bill that would require voters to show up to three forms of identification before being allowed to vote. In addition to the standard voter registration card, a person would need a photo ID card or two other documents without a photo. Currently, only five states require photo identification in order to vote. Some members of the House (cough*Republicans*cough) are behind the bill, claiming that it would reduce voter fraud while others fear that it will discourage people from voting.

What do you think? Good idea or just another way to intimidate voters?

Email This Entry


Comments (4) [rss]

Wow. That is messed up. Those same tactics have been used for years to suppress minority voters. Often times they can flat out reject identification, saying it's invalid, which would be very easy with a non-photo ID. Not to mention you KNOW this standard is not going to be upheld in more affluent neighborhoods. Gotta love the corrupt nature of Texas politics, where they piss on your face in plain view of everyone.

I wouldn't necessarily say intimidation, but more like counter-laziness. Do most people even have three forms of identification?

Another way to intimidate voters, in my leftist opinion.

Another way to intimidate voters. A 21st century poll tax, if you will.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Austinist

Austinist is a news and culture website about Austin, Texas. We publish Monday through Friday, and also maintain a guide to local arts and entertainment events that we call the Weekly IST List.

Editor: Allen Y Chen
Publisher: Gothamist

Recent Comments

Dig It

Contribute

Latest Tip:

where's the public outcry over the condition of waterloo park?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Austinist.

All Our RSS